These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6142306)

  • 1. Mammographic breast pattern and the risk of breast cancer.
    Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Peeters PH; Sturmans F
    Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8377):591-3. PubMed ID: 6142306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of breast cancer and changes in mammographic parenchymal patterns over time.
    Salminen TM; Saarenmaa IE; Heikkilä MM; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 1998; 37(6):547-51. PubMed ID: 9860312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Favorable change in mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk factors.
    Salminen T; Hakama M; Heikkilä M; Saarenmaa I
    Int J Cancer; 1998 Nov; 78(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 9797126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns.
    Sala E; Solomon L; Warren R; McCann J; Duffy S; Luben R; Day N
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 10663736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications?
    Brisson J; Diorio C; Mâsse B
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Aug; 12(8):728-32. PubMed ID: 12917203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unfavourable change in mammographic patterns and the breast cancer risk factors.
    Salminen TM; Saarenmaa IE; Heikkilä MM; Hakama M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1999 Sep; 57(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 10598043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wolfe's mammographic classification and breast cancer risk: the effect of misclassification on apparent risk ratios.
    Grove JS; Goodman MJ; Gilbert FI; Russell H
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jan; 58(685):15-9. PubMed ID: 4063636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is a dense mammographic parenchymal pattern a contraindication to hormonal replacement therapy?
    Salminen TM; Saarenmaa IE; Heikkilä MM; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 2000; 39(8):969-72. PubMed ID: 11207004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status.
    Byrne C; Schairer C; Wolfe J; Parekh N; Salane M; Brinton LA; Hoover R; Haile R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Nov; 87(21):1622-9. PubMed ID: 7563205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammographic patterns and risk of breast cancer.
    Hainline S; Myers L; McLelland R; Newell J; Grufferman S; Shingleton W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jun; 130(6):1157-8. PubMed ID: 418657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship of mammographic parenchymal patterns with breast cancer risk factors and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study.
    de Stavola BL; Gravelle IH; Wang DY; Allen DS; Bulbrook RD; Fentiman IS; Hayward JL; Chaudary MC
    Int J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 19(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 2376431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer.
    Gram IT; Bremnes Y; Ursin G; Maskarinec G; Bjurstam N; Lund E
    Breast Cancer Res; 2005; 7(5):R854-61. PubMed ID: 16168132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship of "high risk" mammographic patterns to histological risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast.
    Arthur JE; Ellis IO; Flowers C; Roebuck E; Elston CW; Blamey RW
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Nov; 63(755):845-9. PubMed ID: 2252976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience.
    Ciatto S; Zappa M
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Sep; 17(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 8223680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical activity and mammographic breast density in a Mediterranean population: the EPIC Florence longitudinal study.
    Masala G; Assedi M; Ambrogetti D; Sera F; Salvini S; Bendinelli B; Ermini I; Giorgi D; Rosselli del Turco M; Palli D
    Int J Cancer; 2009 Apr; 124(7):1654-61. PubMed ID: 19085933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women: a case-control study.
    Nagao Y; Kawaguchi Y; Sugiyama Y; Saji S; Kashiki Y
    Breast Cancer; 2003; 10(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 12955035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer.
    Threatt B; Norbeck JM; Ullman NS; Kummer R; Roselle P
    Cancer; 1980 May; 45(10):2550-6. PubMed ID: 7378990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer prediction and the Wolfe classification of mammograms.
    Carlile T; Kopecky KJ; Thompson DJ; Whitehead JR; Gilbert FI; Present AJ; Threatt BA; Krook P; Hadaway E
    JAMA; 1985 Aug 23-30; 254(8):1050-3. PubMed ID: 4021043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dietary and lifestyle determinants of mammographic breast density. A longitudinal study in a Mediterranean population.
    Masala G; Ambrogetti D; Assedi M; Giorgi D; Del Turco MR; Palli D
    Int J Cancer; 2006 Apr; 118(7):1782-9. PubMed ID: 16231317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.