87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6144928)
21. The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines ignore important scientific evidence and should be revised or withdrawn.
Kopans DB
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20574081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The controversy of mammography screening.
Kopans DB
Adm Radiol; 1995 Jan; 14(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10141106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Screening for breast cancer after the age of 70: effect on breast cancer mortality].
van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Mar; 139(9):428-33. PubMed ID: 7891764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Decrease in breast cancer mortality due to mass screening with mammography; results of the Nijmegen mass screening project 1975-1981].
Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Mravunac M; Sturmans F; Day NE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1985 Mar; 129(10):451-4. PubMed ID: 3982520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.
Daly L
Physician Assist; 1994 Oct; 18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. PubMed ID: 10138304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast cancer screening: from science to recommendation.
Petitti DB; Calonge N; LeFevre ML; Melnyk BM; Wilt TJ; Schwartz JS;
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 20574080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [The benefit of a population based mammography screening--scientifically proven or not?].
Stronegger WJ; Rásky E
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Oct; 128(44):2329-30. PubMed ID: 14593578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for breast cancer: what to do with the evidence.
Harris R
Am Fam Physician; 2007 Jun; 75(11):1623-4, 1626. PubMed ID: 17575651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Mammographic screening fulfills the requirements of health control].
Sandelin K
Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(9):983-4. PubMed ID: 10093435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Monitoring the performance of breast screening programmes: use of indirect standardisation in evaluating the invasive cancer detection rate.
Blanks RG; Day NE; Moss SM
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 8849764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The mammography screening controversy.
Kopans DB
Cancer J Sci Am; 1998; 4(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 9467041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Efficacy of mass screening for breast cancer; reduced mortality nationally and internationally].
de Koning HJ; Boer R; van der Maas PJ; van Ineveld BM; Collette HJ; Hendriks JH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Nov; 134(46):2240-5. PubMed ID: 2255351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast cancer screening policy.
Cox B
N Z Med J; 1998 Nov; 111(1078):459. PubMed ID: 9891567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Breast cancer screening lacks effectiveness].
Merkelbach JW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jan; 146(3):139-40. PubMed ID: 11826675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Physical examination of the breasts in screening for breast cancer.
Baines CJ
J Gerontol; 1992 Nov; 47 Spec No():63-7. PubMed ID: 1430885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast cancer screening policy.
Marshall B
N Z Med J; 1998 Sep; 111(1073):350. PubMed ID: 9785556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Etiology of breast cancer. III. Opportunities for prevention.
Morgan RW; Vakil DV
Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Nov; 111(10):1105-7. PubMed ID: 4154141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A critical appraisal of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study.
Boyd NF; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ; Tritchler D; Lockwood G; Zylak CJ
Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 8234686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast cancer screening: success amid conflict.
Leitch AM
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 8(4):657-72, vi. PubMed ID: 10452933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in women under fifty: a review.
Ewart RM
Nebr Med J; 1992 Dec; 77(12):330-5. PubMed ID: 1480253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
