These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6146082)
1. Can a judge's preference for one body of medical opinion justify a finding of negligence? Brahams D Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8395):177. PubMed ID: 6146082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--legal evaluation of medical expert opinion]. Schlund GH Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):596-602. PubMed ID: 9064930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of the expert witness in medical negligence actions. Maskrey S Trans Med Soc Lond; 1995-1996; 112():26-30. PubMed ID: 9604082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches. Hawkins TS J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. GA: is alleged negligence same as malpractice?: is expert medical testimony needed for negligence? Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Feb; 44(9):3. PubMed ID: 15038329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-trial exchange of expert evidence to become normal practice in medical negligence actions. Brahams D Lancet; 1987 May; 1(8543):1215-6. PubMed ID: 2883535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How medical negligence is established. Morgan J Emerg Nurse; 1998 Sep; 6(5):15-9. PubMed ID: 10474370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits]. Deutsch E Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expert medical testimony is generally required to prove medical negligence. McCarter WD; Hayek TJ Mo Med; 2001 Oct; 98(10):488-9. PubMed ID: 11668860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reported malpractice after postoperative infection of the locomotor system. Analysis of 261 expert testimony evaluations]. St Arens ; Müller L; Hansis M Chirurg; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1263-9. PubMed ID: 9864640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. For debate: the short report - legal and ethical implications. Whitfield HN; van Dellen A Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2021 Sep; 103(8):544-545. PubMed ID: 34464566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modern negligence law: Contribution of the medical cases. Hodgson J Br J Nurs; 2009 Nov 26-Dec 9; 18(21):1320-1. PubMed ID: 20081682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical malpractice litigation. Committee on Medical Liability. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics; 2002 May; 109(5):974-9. PubMed ID: 11986466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: a shift from the Bolam standard? Samanta A; Mello MM; Foster C; Tingle J; Samanta J Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(3):321-66. PubMed ID: 16901977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A model for validating an expert's opinion in medical negligence cases. Smith H J Leg Med; 2005 Jun; 26(2):207-31. PubMed ID: 16036813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The malpractice crisis and the "expert" witness: the problem and a proposed solution. Phibbs BP J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Mar; 33(3):899-900. PubMed ID: 10080500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Expert testimony is not always necessary to prove professional negligence. Matheney v. Sharpe. West JC J Healthc Risk Manag; 2006; 26(4):35. PubMed ID: 19606769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]