These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6146756)

  • 1. Human reproduction: regulated progress or damned interference?
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):202-4. PubMed ID: 6146756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embryo research: UK legislation further delayed.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 1986 Dec 18-31; 324(6098):604. PubMed ID: 3796722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238-9. PubMed ID: 6146804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.
    Nature; 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1; 310(5975):266. PubMed ID: 6462211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A welcome report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Jul; 289(6439):207-8. PubMed ID: 6430410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intimations of life: extracorporeality and the law.
    Smith GP
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(2):395-424. PubMed ID: 11658788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ethics of embryo research: not as easy as it sounds.
    Annas GJ
    Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):138-40, 148. PubMed ID: 3645222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
    Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. British panel grapples with IVF issue, proposes legislation, surrogacy ban.
    Med World News; 1984 Aug; 25(15):28. PubMed ID: 11645522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cloning technique 'reveals legal loophole'.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):757. PubMed ID: 9039895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues.
    Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D
    J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embryo research: British Commons vote for ban.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Feb; 313(6004):618. PubMed ID: 11658513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States.
    Stenger RL
    J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1986 Dec; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.
    Warnock M
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):504-22. PubMed ID: 3852077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-tube embryology in the dock.
    Dickson D
    Science; 1984 Aug; 225(4662):606. PubMed ID: 6740327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Warnock report.
    Warnock M
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6489):187-90. PubMed ID: 3926117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legal and ethical aspects of new reproductive technologies.
    Andrews LB
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 29(1):190-204. PubMed ID: 3955927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.