These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 614871)

  • 1. HIPping of hip prostheses [proceedings].
    Kummer FJ
    Bull Hosp Joint Dis; 1977 Oct; 38(2):76-7. PubMed ID: 614871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Considerations for implant design with application to custom prostheses [proceedings].
    Bartel DL
    Bull Hosp Joint Dis; 1977 Oct; 38(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 614870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Joint prostheses and braces.
    Wright V; Dowson D; Seedhom B
    Mod Trends Rheumatol; 1971; 2():46-59. PubMed ID: 4949591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Making simulation tests for hip joint prostheses more exact].
    Gatti A; Trentani C
    Chir Organi Mov; 1977; 63(6):543-50. PubMed ID: 616389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical considerations of multiple-component hip prostheses. Analysis of three failures of the Lippman transfixation hip prosthesis.
    Amstutz HC; Contini R; Johnson RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1975; (106):131-9. PubMed ID: 1126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A look at the prosthesis-cartilage interface: design of a hip prosthesis containing pressure transducers.
    Carlson CE; Mann RW; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1974; 8(4 Pt 2):261-9. PubMed ID: 4411650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experience in 77 changes of hip-joint prostheses (author's transl)].
    Wolf L
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1978; 116(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 654465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical properties of the bone-prosthesis interface: a study of total hip joint prostheses stabilized with methyl methacrylate and porous ceramic.
    McCarthy TC; Wells MK
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1977 Apr 25-27; 13():41-6. PubMed ID: 871505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the behavior of polyethylene in total joint prostheses [proceedings].
    Rose RM
    Bull Hosp Joint Dis; 1977 Apr; 38(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 922209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty.
    Jafari SM; Parvizi J
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Jan; 39(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 20305834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct anchorage of Al2O3-ceramic hip components: three years of clinical experience and results of further animal studies.
    Heimke G; Griss P; Jentschura G; Werner E
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Jan; 13(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 429385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluations of total hip prostheses with regard to wear and deterioration of the acetabular component [proceedings].
    Rose RM; Crugnola AN; Nusbaum HJ; Paul IL; Simon SR; Radin EL
    Bull Hosp Joint Dis; 1977 Oct; 38(2):126-7. PubMed ID: 614866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design of total hip prosthesis: the femoral stem.
    Brockhurst PJ; Svensson NL
    Med Prog Technol; 1977 Sep; 5(2):73-102. PubMed ID: 927397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene-graphite-coated total hip prostheses in goats.
    Parvongnukul K; Lumb WV
    Am J Vet Res; 1978 Feb; 39(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 629455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The biomechanics of total joint replacement surgery.
    Chao EY
    Geriatrics; 1976 Mar; 31(3):48-57. PubMed ID: 1248748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiologic aspects of the new universal proximal femoral hip prosthesis.
    Drinker H; Mall JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Sep; 129(3):531-3. PubMed ID: 409218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hip prosthesis with physiological transmission of forces and individually isoelastic properties.
    Engelhardt A; Grell H; Heipertz W; Kooke D
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1976; 42 Suppl 1():220-8. PubMed ID: 1029365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mechanical and tribological properties of ceramic endoprostheses (totalhips) (author's transl)].
    Dörre E; Dawihl W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1978 Dec; 23(12):305-10. PubMed ID: 728520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental study in femoral component total hip replacement: mechanical failures of cement-bone interface with comparison of prosthesis, cement thickness, orientation and plug insertion.
    Savino AW
    Proc Inst Med Chic; 1978; 32(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 662836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative study of the femoral element of various total hip arthroplasties. Biomechanical aspects].
    Kempf I; Jaeger JH; Nessius A; Mochel D; Clavert JM
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1976; 42 Suppl 1():194-19. PubMed ID: 1029363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.