These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6150496)
21. Pimozide prevents the response-reinstating effects of water reinforcement in rats. Ettenberg A; Horvitz JC Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1990 Nov; 37(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 2087488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differential effects of clozapine and pimozide on fixed-ratio responding during repeated dosing. Wiley JL; Compton AD; Porter JH Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 May; 48(1):253-7. PubMed ID: 8029297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance. Heyman GM; Kinzie DL; Seiden LS Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 88(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 3083455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Failure to obtain functional equivalence between dopamine receptor blockade and extinction: evidence supporting a sensory-motor conditioning hypothesis. Tombaugh TN; Szostak C; Voorneveld P; Tombaugh JW Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Jan; 16(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 7058214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Response decrement patterns after neuroleptic and non-neuroleptic drugs. Sanger DJ Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 89(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 2874584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An examination of methodological refinements, clozapine and fluphenazine in the anhedonia paradigm. Faustman WO; Fowler SC Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Nov; 17(5):987-93. PubMed ID: 7178208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Differential sensitivity of operant behaviors to changes in the concentration of a sucrose reinforcer: effects of pimozide. Vigorito M; Kruse CB; Carretta JC Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Mar; 47(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 8208769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance effects with repeated-response measures during pimozide-produced dopamine receptor blockade. Ettenberg A; Cinsavich SA; White N Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Nov; 11(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 531078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of pimozide on appetitive behavior and locomotor activity: dissimilarity of effects when compared to extinction. Spivak KJ; Amit Z Physiol Behav; 1986; 36(3):457-63. PubMed ID: 3703975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Blockade by neuroleptics of water intake and operant responding for water in the rat: anhedonia, motor deficit, or both? Ljungberg T Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1987 Jun; 27(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 2888135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of pimozide, across doses and within sessions, on discriminated lever release performance in rats. Skjoldager P; Fowler SC Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 96(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 3147474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of pimozide on home cage ethanol drinking in the rat: dependence on drinking session length. Pfeffer AO; Samson HH Drug Alcohol Depend; 1986 May; 17(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 3720531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differential effects of pimozide on response-rate and choice accuracy in a self-stimulation paradigm in mice. Bowers W; Hamilton M; Zacharko RM; Anisman H Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Apr; 22(4):521-6. PubMed ID: 2859610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pimozide decreases the positive reinforcing effect of sham fed sucrose in the rat. Geary N; Smith GP Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 May; 22(5):787-90. PubMed ID: 2989944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of pimozide on emitted force, duration and rate of operant response maintained at low and high levels of required force. Fowler SC; Gramling SE; Liao RM Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Sep; 25(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 3774827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of environmental enrichment on extinction and reinstatement of amphetamine self-administration and sucrose-maintained responding. Stairs DJ; Klein ED; Bardo MT Behav Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 17(7):597-604. PubMed ID: 17021392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anticipatory contrast effect in rats: a new view with lick response analysis and the effect of dopamine blocking. Chen BH; Hsiao S Chin J Physiol; 1996; 39(4):235-43. PubMed ID: 9058008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Complex response competition and dopamine blocking: choosing of high cost sucrose solution versus low cost water in rats. Hsiao S; Chen BH Chin J Physiol; 1995; 38(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 8697904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]