These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6151021)

  • 1. Gap junctions increase the sensitivity of tissue cells to exogenous electric fields.
    Cooper MS
    J Theor Biol; 1984 Nov; 111(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 6151021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophoretic repatterning of charged cytoplasmic molecules within tissues coupled by gap junctions by externally applied electric fields.
    Cooper MS; Miller JP; Fraser SE
    Dev Biol; 1989 Mar; 132(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 2917693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electric current flow in a two-cell preparation from Chironomus salivary glands.
    Metzger P; Weingart R
    J Physiol; 1984 Jan; 346():599-619. PubMed ID: 6699787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncoupling cell junctions in a glandular epithelium by depolarizing current.
    Socolar SJ; Politoff AL
    Science; 1971 Apr; 172(3982):492-4. PubMed ID: 5550507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intracellular pH, intracellular free Ca, and junctional cell-cell coupling.
    Rose B; Rick R
    J Membr Biol; 1978 Dec; 44(3-4):377-415. PubMed ID: 37341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Junctional membrane permeability: restoration by repolarizing current.
    Rose B
    Science; 1970 Aug; 169(3945):607-9. PubMed ID: 4987682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical properties of an excitable epithelium.
    Josephson RK; Schwab WE
    J Gen Physiol; 1979 Aug; 74(2):213-36. PubMed ID: 39970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cellular communication through membrane junctions. Special consideration of wound healing and cancer.
    Loewenstein WR
    Arch Intern Med; 1972 Feb; 129(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 4333645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intercellular communication in normal and regenerating rat liver: a quantitative analysis.
    Meyer DJ; Yancey SB; Revel JP
    J Cell Biol; 1981 Nov; 91(2 Pt 1):505-23. PubMed ID: 7309793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model approaches for the evaluation of electrical cell coupling in the salivary gland of the larva of Drosophila hydei. The influence of lysolecithin on the electrical coupling.
    van Venrooij GE; Hax WM; van Dantzig GF; Prijs V; van der Deiner JJ; van der Gon
    J Membr Biol; 1974; 19(3):229-52. PubMed ID: 4444018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Changes in the conductivity of intercellular contacts in the process of cell differentiation in the salivary gland of the Drosophila virilis larvae at the 3rd stage of development].
    Vozhkova VP; Kovalev SA; Mittel'man LA; Shilianskaia EN
    Tsitologiia; 1970 Sep; 12(9):1110-5. PubMed ID: 5515774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A voltage-dependent gap junction in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Verselis VK; Bennett MV; Bargiello TA
    Biophys J; 1991 Jan; 59(1):114-26. PubMed ID: 1901743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gap junctional intercellular communication in bone: a cellular basis for the mechanostat set point.
    Donahue HJ
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1998 Feb; 62(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 9437038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical coupling between cells of the insect Aedes albopictus.
    Bukauskas F; Kempf C; Weingart R
    J Physiol; 1992 Mar; 448():321-37. PubMed ID: 1593470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of electric field changes in the cleft between excitable cells.
    Sperelakis N; Mann JE
    J Theor Biol; 1977 Jan; 64(1):71-96. PubMed ID: 836519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control of intercellular communication by voltage dependence of gap junctional conductance.
    Harris AL; Spray DC; Bennett MV
    J Neurosci; 1983 Jan; 3(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 6822860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biophysical properties of gap junctions between freshly dispersed pairs of mouse pancreatic beta cells.
    Pérez-Armendariz M; Roy C; Spray DC; Bennett MV
    Biophys J; 1991 Jan; 59(1):76-92. PubMed ID: 2015391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Voltage dependence of junctional conductance in early amphibian embryos.
    Spray DC; Harris AL; Bennett MV
    Science; 1979 Apr; 204(4391):432-4. PubMed ID: 312530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of the Hodgkin--Huxley equations to an electric field model for interaction between excitable cells.
    Ruffner JA; Sperelakis N; Mann JE
    J Theor Biol; 1980 Nov; 87(1):129-52. PubMed ID: 7206743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The coupling coefficient as an index of junctional conductance.
    Socolar SJ
    J Membr Biol; 1977 Jun; 34(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 894699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.