These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6152861)

  • 1. [Comparison time of pictures: how does reaction time change when the number of necessary steps for decision stays the same].
    Czigler I; Tölgyesi M
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1984; (Suppl 6):47-64. PubMed ID: 6152861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Target-distractor discriminability in visual search.
    Pashler H
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Apr; 41(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 3588236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preserving informational separability and violating decisional separability in facial perception and recognition.
    Wenger MJ; Ingvalson EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1106-18. PubMed ID: 14622050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The picture superiority effect: support for the distinctiveness model.
    Mintzer MZ; Snodgrass JG
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):113-46. PubMed ID: 10696280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global precedence in attention and decision.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Dec; 7(6):1161-74. PubMed ID: 6458645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In search of perceptual priming in a semantic classification task.
    Bowers JS; Turner EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1248-55. PubMed ID: 14622058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complexity effects on reaction-time measures of visual persistence: evidence for peripheral and central contributions.
    Long GM; Wurst SA
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(4):537-61. PubMed ID: 6517163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjustment of an observer to a limited set of pictures in the course of an experiment.
    Glezer VD; Kostelyanets NB; Levkovich YuI
    Hum Physiol; 1979; 5(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 548441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus encoding by mentally retarded and nonretarded adults.
    Caruso DR; Detterman DK
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 May; 87(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 6869423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allocation of attention and task difficulty.
    Merrill EC; Peacock M
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 8192904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.
    Lien MC; Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Grabbe J; McCann RS; Remington RW
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):431-47. PubMed ID: 16953708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similarity judgments, distances, reaction times, and eye-movements in the perception of reactangles.
    Schroiff HW; Borg I; Staufenbiel T
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1986; 138(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 3579550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Demands on attention and the role of response priming in visual discrimination of feature conjunctions.
    Fournier LR; Herbert RJ; Farris C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):836-52. PubMed ID: 15462624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Attention and automatic processing: reaction time and changes in accuracy of reaction as indicators of automatic processing phenomena].
    Zimmer H; Vossel G; Fröhlich WD
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1987; 34(4):674-92. PubMed ID: 3424883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of intradimensional and extradimensional shifts on visual discrimination learning in humans and non-human primates.
    Roberts AC; Robbins TW; Everitt BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1988 Nov; 40(4):321-41. PubMed ID: 3145534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task.
    Holcomb PJ; McPherson WB
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Mar; 24(2):259-76. PubMed ID: 8185897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts.
    Brown S; Steyvers M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):587-99. PubMed ID: 16060767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation.
    Brockmole JR; Boot WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):808-15. PubMed ID: 19485693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.