These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6153356)

  • 1. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Ainslie PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6153356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A digital filter for brain stem evoked responses.
    Møller AR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1980 Nov; 1(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 7457758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analog and zero phase-shift digital filtering of the auditory brain stem response waveform.
    Domico WD; Kavanagh KT
    Ear Hear; 1986 Dec; 7(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 3792680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT; Franks R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Apr; 51(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 6164544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unrecognized errors due to analog filtering of the brain-stem auditory evoked response.
    Janssen R; Benignus VA; Grimes LM; Dyer RS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 2420573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving brain stem auditory evoked potential recordings by digital filtering.
    Møller AR
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 6840414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High pass digital and analog filtering of the middle latency response.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD
    Ear Hear; 1987 Apr; 8(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 3582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital inverse filtering of distorted auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 7323677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Highpass filtering of auditory evoked brain stem potentials (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J; Althaus V
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 7295174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer identification of waves in the auditory brain stem evoked potentials.
    Gabriel S; Durrant JD; Dickter AE; Kephart JE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Aug; 49(3-4):421-3. PubMed ID: 6158422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Filtering of neurophysiologic signals.
    Burgess RC
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():51-65. PubMed ID: 31277873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings.
    Achor LJ; Starr A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Feb; 48(2):154-73. PubMed ID: 6153332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering.
    Svensson O; Almqvist B; Jönsson KE
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3589480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain stem auditory evoked response development in the kitten.
    Shipley C; Buchwald JS; Norman R; Guthrie D
    Brain Res; 1980 Jan; 182(2):313-26. PubMed ID: 7357388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short latency somatosensory and spinal evoked potentials: power spectra and comparison between high pass analog and digital filter.
    Maccabee PJ; Hassan NF; Cracco RQ; Schiff JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 2420570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of high-pass filter frequency and slope on BAEP amplitude, latency and wave form.
    Elton M; Scherg M; Von Cramon D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 May; 57(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 6201344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of zero-phase digital filters to enhance brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs).
    Møller AR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 2451604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.