These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6158228)

  • 1. Comparison of patch test results in two adjacent areas of England. II. Medicaments.
    Wilkinson JD; Hambly EM; Wilkinson DS
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1980; 60(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 6158228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of patch test results in two adjacent areas of England-I. (Industrial allergens).
    Wilkinson DS; Wilkinson JD
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1979; 59(85):189-92. PubMed ID: 160731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medicament contact allergy.
    Edman B; Möller H
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1986; 34(5):139-43. PubMed ID: 2947793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
    Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Allergic contact dermatitis due to ingredients of vehicles. A "vehicle tray" for patch testing.
    Fisher AA; Pascher F; Kanof NB
    Arch Dermatol; 1971 Sep; 104(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 4255443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Excited skin syndrome: study of 39 patients.
    Duarte I; Lazzarini R; Bedrikow R
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Jun; 13(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 12022121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
    Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
    Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
    Soni BP; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sources of sensitization, cross-reactions, and occupational sensitization to topical anaesthetics among general dermatology patients.
    Jussi L; Lammintausta K
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Mar; 60(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 19260912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
    Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The disturbance of epidermal barrier function in atopy patch test reactions in atopic eczema.
    Gfesser M; Rakoski J; Ring J
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Oct; 135(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 8915146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A high-positive patch test load correlates with further positive patch test reactions irrespective of their location.
    Brasch J; Geier J; Schnuch A; Uter W; ;
    Allergy; 2006 Dec; 61(12):1411-5. PubMed ID: 17073870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Side effects of external ophthalmologic drugs].
    Frosch PJ; Weickel R; Schmitt T; Krastel H
    Z Hautkr; 1988 Feb; 63(2):126, 129-32, 135-6. PubMed ID: 2967595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
    Lazarov A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate are not modified by neighbouring negative fragrance patch tests. A multicenter-study by the German contact dermatitis research group.
    Brasch J; Weichenthal M; Szliska C; Löffler H; Koch P; Grabbe J; Mahler V; Kreilgård B; Hoeck U;
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 16874422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which children should we patch test?
    Beattie PE; Green C; Lowe G; Lewis-Jones MS
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jan; 32(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17004990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Allergic contact dermatitis from doxepin cream. One-year patch test clinic experience.
    Taylor JS; Praditsuwan P; Handel D; Kuffner G
    Arch Dermatol; 1996 May; 132(5):515-8. PubMed ID: 8624147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.