These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 615871)

  • 21. Numerical simulation of noninvasive blood pressure measurement.
    Hayashi S; Hayase T; Shirai A; Maruyama M
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 16995754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characteristic resistance curves of aortic valve substitutes facilitate individualized decision for a particular type.
    Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Pohl A; Wendt MO; Hartrumpf M; Pohl M; Albes JM
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):450-5; discussion 455. PubMed ID: 15740954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A new self-expanding aortic stent valve with annular fixation: in vitro haemodynamic assessment.
    Vergnat M; Henaine R; Kalejs M; Bommeli S; Ferrari E; Obadia JF; Von Segesser LK
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):970-5; discussion 975-6. PubMed ID: 19409805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ventriculo-aortic junction in human root. A geometric approach.
    Grousson N; Lim KH; Lim HS; Ooi ET; Salgues SL; Yeo JH; Goetz WA
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(10):2167-73. PubMed ID: 17166505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance assessment of prosthetic heart valves using the energy index method.
    Souza-Campos F; Schoephoerster RT
    ASAIO J; 1996; 42(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 8725683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accelerated life testing of prosthetic heart valves.
    Fettel BE; Johnston DR; Morris PE
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 7382899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Geometric modeling of functional trileaflet aortic valves: development and clinical applications.
    Labrosse MR; Beller CJ; Robicsek F; Thubrikar MJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(14):2665-72. PubMed ID: 16199047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.
    Cox JL; Ad N; Myers K; Gharib M; Quijano RC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 16077422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A simple, inexpensive, automatic switch valve for a constant-monitor system.
    Duggar PN
    Anesthesiology; 1971 Jul; 35(1):91-2. PubMed ID: 5092492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Indication of cavitation in mechanical heart valve patients.
    Andersen TS; Johansen P; Paulsen PK; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov; 12(6):790-6. PubMed ID: 14658822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro comparison of aortic heart valve prostheses. Part 1: Mechanical valves.
    Knott E; Reul H; Knoch M; Steinseifer U; Rau G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Dec; 96(6):952-61. PubMed ID: 3193804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Hemodynamics study of cardiovascular system in vitro simulation].
    Li H; Qian K
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 23(4):778-80. PubMed ID: 17002106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Studies in calf venous pump function utilizing a two-valve experimental model.
    Raju S; Hudson CA; Fredericks R; Neglén P; Greene AB; Meydrech EF
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Jun; 17(6):521-32. PubMed ID: 10375488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Structural simulations of prosthetic tri-leaflet aortic heart valves.
    Haj-Ali R; Dasi LP; Kim HS; Choi J; Leo HW; Yoganathan AP
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(7):1510-9. PubMed ID: 18395212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.