These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6160319)

  • 1. A comparison of speech intelligibility between esophageal and normal speakers via three modes of presentation.
    Hubbard DJ; Kushner D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 6160319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Clear Speech on Cantonese Alaryngeal Speakers' Intelligibility.
    Hui TF; Cox SR; Huang T; Chen WR; Ng ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 34333487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech.
    Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligibility of oesophageal and tracheo-oesophageal speech: preliminary observations.
    Max L; De Bruyn W; Steurs W
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 9519117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech.
    Ng ML
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups.
    Bridges A
    Br J Disord Commun; 1991 Dec; 26(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 1814417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intelligibility characteristics of superior esophageal speech presented under various levels of masking noise.
    Horii Y; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 1186150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-administered intelligibility practice for esophageal speakers.
    Fitzpatrick PA; Gould D; Nichols AC
    J Commun Disord; 1980 Sep; 13(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 7419727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech.
    Kalb MB; Carpenter MA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Feb; 46(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7206682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual comparison of neoglottal, oesophageal and normal speech.
    Ainsworth WA; Singh W
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1992; 44(6):297-307. PubMed ID: 1286842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech intelligibility, acceptability, and communication-related quality of life in Chinese alaryngeal speakers.
    Law IK; Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 135(7):704-11. PubMed ID: 19620593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of visual information on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Keintz CK; Bunton K; Hoit JD
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2007 Aug; 16(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 17666548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ratings of intelligibility of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech.
    Cullinan WL; Brown CS; Blalock PD
    J Commun Disord; 1986 Jun; 19(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 3722432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing.
    Williams SE; Watson JB
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jun; 97(6):737-9. PubMed ID: 3586817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech production.
    Most T; Tobin Y; Mimran RC
    J Commun Disord; 2000; 33(2):165-80; quiz 180-1. PubMed ID: 10834832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judgments by children and adults regarding communication skills of esophageal speakers.
    Salmon SJ; Kushner H; Knox AW
    J Commun Disord; 1979 Apr; 12(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 429609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
    Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tone in Thai alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B; Petty SH; Dardarananda R
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Feb; 53(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 3339865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oral pressures, vowel durations, and acceptability ratings of esophageal speakers.
    Swisher WE
    J Commun Disord; 1980 May; 13(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 7381038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.