These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6160976)

  • 1. The effect of varying stimulus polarity (rarefaction Vs. condensation) on early auditory evoked potentials (EAEPs).
    Maurer K; Schäfer E; Leitner H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Nov; 50(3-4):332-4. PubMed ID: 6160976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The effect of rarefaction and condensation tone pips on early auditory evoked potentials (EAEP) (author's transl)].
    Maurer K; Schäfer E; Leitner H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Sep; 60(9):484-7. PubMed ID: 7345316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainties of topodiagnosis of auditory nerve and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials due to rarefaction and condensation stimuli.
    Maurer K
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1985 Mar; 62(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2578943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Rarefaction-pressure problem of acoustic stimuli from the neuro-otologic viewpoint].
    Maurer K
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Mar; 64(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 3990480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Acoustic evoked potentials and topical diagnosis in the central nervous system].
    Maurer K
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1985 Sep; 16(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 3933954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Further differences between brain-stem auditory potentials evoked by rarefaction and condensation clicks as revealed by vector analysis.
    Coutin P; Balmaseda A; Miranda J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 66(4):420-6. PubMed ID: 2435522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of click polarity on the brain-stem auditory evoked response (BAER) revisited.
    Schwartz DM; Morris MD; Spydell JD; Ten Brink C; Grim MA; Schwartz JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(6):445-57. PubMed ID: 1701707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of cochlear processes in generating Jewett IV and V brain stem potential components].
    Janssen T; Böhnke F; Steinhoff HJ
    HNO; 1988 Dec; 36(12):511-5. PubMed ID: 3235366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory brain stem responses (ABR) in cat. Latency as a function of stimulus polarity, intensity and acoustic waveform.
    Tvete O; Haugsten P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():35-8. PubMed ID: 6944776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear potentials and auditory evoked potentials in the caiman (Caiman crocodilus (L.)).
    Smolders JW; Caird DM; Klinke R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Feb; 75(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 1688779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of stimulus polarity on far-field auditory-evoked electrical responses in the chick.
    Brown-Borg HM; Beck MM; Jones TA
    J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 3436924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Functional status of the brain stem in cerebral circulatory disorders according to the results of a study of evoked brain-stem auditory potentials].
    Sumskiĭ LI; Kuksova NS; Laputin EB; Gel'fenbeĭn MS
    Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1985; 85(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 3993290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials evoked by clicks of different polarity in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Tackmann W; Vogel P
    Eur Neurol; 1987; 26(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 3595656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early auditory evoked potentials (EAEPs) in the rabbit. Normative data and effects of lesions in the cerebello-pontine angle.
    Maurer K; Mika H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 May; 55(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 6187553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value of the simultaneous recording of brain stem auditory evoked potentials, blink reflex, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials for the assessment of brainstem function in clinical neurology.
    Van Nechel C; Deltenre P; Strul S; Capon A
    Adv Neurol; 1982; 32():203-10. PubMed ID: 7054941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cerebrovascular accidents affecting the brain stem and evoked auditory potentials (author's transl)].
    Robier A; Saudeau D; Autret A; Reynaud J
    Rev Otoneuroophtalmol; 1981; 53(4):301-10. PubMed ID: 7336036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural interaction in human auditory brainstem evoked potentials.
    Wrege KS; Starr A
    Arch Neurol; 1981 Sep; 38(9):572-80. PubMed ID: 7271536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurological applications of early auditory evoked potentials (EAEP) in acoustic nerve and brainstem disorders.
    Maurer K; Leitner H; Schäfer E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979 Mar; 11():119-33. PubMed ID: 299179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of brain stem auditory evoked potentials for monaural and binaural stimuli.
    Ainslie PJ; Boston JR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Aug; 49(3-4):291-302. PubMed ID: 6158405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.