These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6165736)

  • 1. Rapid method that aids in distinguishing Gram-positive from Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria.
    Halebian S; Harris B; Finegold SM; Rolfe RD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):444-8. PubMed ID: 6165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the KOH test and the antibiotic disk test in routine clinical anaerobic bacteriology.
    Bourgault AM; Lamothe F
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2144-6. PubMed ID: 3183000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Supplementary methods for the determination of the Gram reaction of anaerobic pathogens].
    Höhne C; Sandow D
    J Basic Microbiol; 1987; 27(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 2448452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a commercial disk test with vancomycin and colimycin susceptibility testing for identification of bacteria with abnormal gram staining reactions.
    Fenollar F; Raoult D
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 Jan; 19(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10706177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of the KOH and vancomycin tests in determining the Gram reaction of non-enterobacterial rods.
    von Graevenitz A; Bucher C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Oct; 18(4):983-5. PubMed ID: 6355173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of marine bacteria.
    Buck JD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 44(4):992-3. PubMed ID: 6184019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro activity of sodium fusidate against anaerobic bacteria.
    Steinkraus GE; McCarthy LR
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Aug; 16(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 485124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods for distinguishing gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria.
    Carlone GM; Valadez MJ; Pickett MJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Dec; 16(6):1157-9. PubMed ID: 6186691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of a method of differentiating Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using a 3% solution of KOH].
    Kondrat'eva SI
    Lab Delo; 1982; (1):54-5. PubMed ID: 6174795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of spot esculin hydrolysis with the PathoTec strip test for rapid differentiation of anaerobic bacteria.
    Qadri SM; Johnson S; Smith JC; Zubairi S; Gillum RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 7016896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Application of "Microring AN" to "Level 1": presumptive identification of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli].
    Tanaka K; Nakao K; Mikamo H; Watanabe K
    Rinsho Biseibutshu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai Shi; 2006; 17(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 17822332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple identification of anaerobic bacteria to genus level using typical antibiotic susceptibility patterns.
    Essers L
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1982 Jun; 52(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 7118745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation between gram-negative anaerobic bacteria by pyrolysis gas chromatography of lipopolysaccharides.
    Dahlén G; Ericsson I
    J Gen Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 129(3):557-63. PubMed ID: 6875512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Anaerobe identification system.
    Cavallaro JJ; Wiggs LS; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3186-91. PubMed ID: 9399517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antibiotic disc susceptibility tests for rapid presumptive identification of Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli.
    Sutter VL; Finegold SM
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Jan; 21(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 5204230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-vitro activity of solithromycin against anaerobic bacteria from the normal intestinal microbiota.
    Weintraub A; Rashid MU; Nord CE
    Anaerobe; 2016 Dec; 42():119-122. PubMed ID: 27725229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Susceptibilities of 428 gram-positive and -negative anaerobic bacteria to Bay y3118 compared with their susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, metronidazole, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefoxitin.
    Pankuch GA; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1993 Aug; 37(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 8215278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli by using rapid slide tests for beta-lactamase production.
    Bourgault AM; Rosenblatt JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Jun; 9(6):654-6. PubMed ID: 41001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative in vitro activity of cefpodoxime against anaerobes other than Bacteroides fragilis.
    Werner H; Heizmann WR; Höflsauer M
    Infection; 1991; 19(5):377-9. PubMed ID: 1800380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A reliable test for differentiation and presumptive identification of certain clinically significant anaerobes.
    Hansen SL; Stewart BJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Jan; 69(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 339709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.