These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6167955)

  • 21. "Are the differences between 'high performance' pacing leads clinically significant? A comparison of sintered platinum and activated carbon".
    Bourke JP; Jameson S; Howell L; Gold RG
    Int J Artif Organs; 1987 Jan; 10(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 3570545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sintered platinum for cardiac pacing.
    Freud GE; Chinaglia B
    Int J Artif Organs; 1981 Sep; 4(5):238-42. PubMed ID: 7319663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do electrode and lead design differences for permanent cardiac pacing translate into clinically demonstrable differences? (Comparison of sintered platinum and activated vitreous and porous carbon electrodes).
    Bourke JP; Howell L; Murray A; Hill WE; Cowan JC; Beatt K; Errington J; Jameson S; Gold RG
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Aug; 12(8):1419-25. PubMed ID: 2476767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The current status of cardiac pacing.
    Roy OZ
    CRC Crit Rev Bioeng; 1975 Jun; 2(3):259-327. PubMed ID: 1095301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Physiological and electrical characteristics of the porous endocardial electrode.
    Amundson DC; MacCarter DJ; McArthur W; Mosharrafa M
    Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):292-4. PubMed ID: 502928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bioelectrical energy sources for cardiac pacemakers.
    Cassel J; Satinsky VP; Salkind A
    J Assoc Adv Med Instrum; 1972; 6(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 5079984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intracardiac electrical bioimpedance as a basis for controlling of pacing rate limits.
    Kink A; Salo RW; Min M; Parve T; Rätsep I
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6308-11. PubMed ID: 17946757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Steroid-tipped leads versus porous platinum permanent pacemaker leads: a controlled study.
    Wish M; Swartz J; Cohen A; Cohen R; Fletcher R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1887-90. PubMed ID: 1704561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Successful results of a bipolar active fixation lead for atrial application: an interim analysis.
    Buys EM; Van Hemel NM; Jessurun ER; Poot B; Kelder JC; Defauw JJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Apr; 23(4 Pt 1):499-503. PubMed ID: 10793441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of local steroid elution on chronic pacing threshold and impedance of endocardial pacemaker leads.
    Schuchert A; Kuck KH
    Cardiology; 1993; 83(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 8281540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chronic ventricular electrograms: do steroid-eluting leads differ from conventional leads?
    Schuchert A; Hopf M; Kuck KH; Bleifeld W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1879-82. PubMed ID: 1704559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chronic performance of a transvenous steroid pacing lead used as an epi-intramyocardial electrode.
    Karpawich PP; Walters H; Hakimi M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1486-8. PubMed ID: 9670197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical experience with new leads.
    Mugica J; Duconge B; Henry L; Atchia B; Lazarus B
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1745-52. PubMed ID: 2463543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Animal experiments with a new intracardial pacemaker electrode].
    Babotai I; Meier WE; Schölzel E
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1976; Suppl():144-7. PubMed ID: 1031789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Initial results with an activated pyrolytic carbon tip electrode.
    Garberoglio B; Inguaggiato B; Chinaglia B; Cerise O
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Mar; 6(2 Pt 2):440-8. PubMed ID: 6189090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of pacing electrodes of different shape and material--recommendations.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Mar; 6(2 Pt 2):422-6. PubMed ID: 6189087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.
    Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Unipolar recording and pacing using a conductive introducer sheath as the indifferent electrode.
    Goldman DS; Buck JC; Larnard DJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):2014-7. PubMed ID: 8945088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Active fixation leads--long-term threshold reduction using a drug-infused ceramic collar.
    Anderson N; Mathivanar R; Skalsky M; Tunstell A; Ng M; Harman D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1767-71. PubMed ID: 1721172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Low stimulation impedance in pacemaker patients with cardiac diseases. The Thera Pacemaker Study Group].
    Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Aug; 121(34-35):1046-9. PubMed ID: 8829905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.