184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6172534)
1. Analysis of T cell hybridomas. II. Comparisons among three distinct types of monoclonal suppressor factors.
Okuda K; Minami M; Furusawa M; Dorf ME
J Exp Med; 1981 Dec; 154(6):1838-51. PubMed ID: 6172534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of T cell hybridomas. I. Characterization of H-2 and Igh-restricted monoclonal suppressor factors.
Minami M; Okuda K; Furusawa S; Benacerraf B; Dorf ME
J Exp Med; 1981 Nov; 154(5):1390-402. PubMed ID: 6170719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of T cell hybridomas. IV. Characterization of inducible suppressor cell hybridomas.
Minami M; Okuda K; Furusawa S; Dorf ME
J Exp Med; 1983 May; 157(5):1379-95. PubMed ID: 6189933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of I-J and Igh determinants on F1-derived suppressor factor in controlling restriction specificity.
Minami M; Aoki I; Honji N; Waltenbaugh CR; Dorf ME
J Exp Med; 1983 Nov; 158(5):1428-43. PubMed ID: 6195283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equivalence of conventional anti-picryl T suppressor factor in the contact sensitivity system and monoclonal anti-NP TsF3: their final non-specific effect via the T acceptor cell.
Asherson GL; Dorf ME; Colizzi V; Zembala M; James BM
Immunology; 1984 Nov; 53(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 6333385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of T cell hybridomas. III. Distinctions between two types of hapten-specific suppressor factors that affect plaque-forming cell responses.
Sherr DH; Minami M; Okuda K; Dorf ME
J Exp Med; 1983 Feb; 157(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 6185612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanism controlling the genetic restrictions of an NP-specific suppressor factor that inhibits B cell responses.
Hausman PB; Sherr DH; Dorf ME
J Immunol; 1985 Aug; 135(2):915-21. PubMed ID: 2409159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A monoclonal antibody raised to tumor-specific T cell-derived suppressor factors also recognizes T suppressor inducer factors of the 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl acetyl hapten suppressor network.
Steele JK; Kawasaki H; Kuchroo VK; Minami M; Levy JG; Dorf ME
J Immunol; 1987 Oct; 139(8):2629-34. PubMed ID: 2443567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. I-J restrictions on the activation and interaction of parental and F1-derived TS3 suppressor cells.
Minami M; Furusawa S; Dorf ME
J Exp Med; 1982 Aug; 156(2):465-79. PubMed ID: 6212624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Idiotypic and fine specificity analysis of a (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP)-specific suppressor T cell hybridoma at the level of cell surface structures, isolated receptor material and functional suppressor factor.
Suzuki G; Cramer M; Hayakawa K; Okumura K; Tada T
Eur J Immunol; 1983 Sep; 13(9):711-9. PubMed ID: 6225648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antigen-specific suppressor T cell interactions. I. Induction of an MHC-restricted suppressor factor specific for L-glutamic acid50-L-tyrosine50.
Kapp JA; Araneo BA
J Immunol; 1982 Jun; 128(6):2447-52. PubMed ID: 6176635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transfection of TCR alpha-chains into suppressor and T helper cell hybridomas. Production of suppressor factors with predicted antigen specificity.
Kuchroo VK; Byrne MC; Greenfield E; Whitters MJ; Nalefsky EA; Rao A; Collins M; Dorf ME
J Immunol; 1995 May; 154(10):5030-8. PubMed ID: 7730610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulation of immune responses by I-J gene products. IV. Distinct suppressor factors derived from "nonsuppressor" A strain mice.
Lei HY; Waltenbaugh C
J Immunol; 1984 Oct; 133(4):1723-9. PubMed ID: 6206133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional analysis of cloned macrophage hybridomas. VI. Differential ability to induce immunity or suppression.
Kuchroo VK; Minami M; Diamond B; Dorf ME
J Immunol; 1988 Jul; 141(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 2454255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A genetically restricted suppressor factor that requires interaction with two distinct targets.
Aoki I; Usui M; Minami M; Dorf ME
J Immunol; 1984 Apr; 132(4):1735-40. PubMed ID: 6230392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional analysis of cloned macrophage hybridomas. V. Induction of suppressor T cell responses.
Kawasaki H; Martin CA; Uchida T; Usui M; Noma T; Minami M; Dorf ME
J Immunol; 1986 Oct; 137(7):2145-51. PubMed ID: 2944950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antigen-specific suppressor T cell interactions. II. Characterization of two different types of suppressor T cell factors specific for L-glutamic acid50-L-tyrosine50 (GT) and L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT).
Kapp JA; Sorensen CM; Pierce CW
J Exp Med; 1983 Dec; 158(6):1962-78. PubMed ID: 6606014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antigen-specific suppression in genetic responder mice to L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT). Characterization of conventional and hybridoma-derived factors produced by suppressor T cells from mice injected as neonates with syngeneic GAT macrophages.
Sorensen CM; Pierce CW
J Exp Med; 1982 Dec; 156(6):1691-710. PubMed ID: 6184435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hapten-specific responses to the phenyltrimethylamino hapten. V. A single chain antigen-binding I-J+ first-order T suppressor factor requires antigen to induce anti-idiotypic second-order suppressor T cells.
Jayaraman S; Bellone CJ
J Immunol; 1985 Feb; 134(2):1010-8. PubMed ID: 3155532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monoclonal antibodies specific for single chain or two chain GAT-specific suppressor factors: production and analysis of in vitro modulating properties.
Sorensen CM; Pierce CW
J Immunol; 1985 Jul; 135(1):362-7. PubMed ID: 2582038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
