180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6174058)
21. PAPNET for analysis of proliferating (MIB-1 positive) cell populations in cervical smears.
Boon ME; Kleinschmidt-Guy ED; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E
Eur J Morphol; 1994 Mar; 32(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 8086271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Numerical analysis of cell populations in smear and monolayer preparations from the uterine cervix. I. The proportions of isolated, abnormal epithelial cells in slides from one applicator.
Neugebauer D; Otto K; Soost HJ
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Jun; 3(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 7258858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Automatic screening of Papanicolaou stained cervical smears with the T. A. S.
Meyer F; van Driel A
Microsc Acta Suppl; 1980; Suppl 4():82-95. PubMed ID: 6157078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Standardization of the Papanicolaou stain. I. A comparison of five nuclear stains.
Schulte E; Wittekind D
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1990 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 1695100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tumor marker studies of cervical smears. Potential for automation.
Moncrieff D; Ormerod MG; Coleman DV
Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(4):407-10. PubMed ID: 6205530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detailed account of confounding factors in interpretation of FTIR spectra of exfoliated cervical cells.
Wong PT; Senterman MK; Jackli P; Wong RK; Salib S; Campbell CE; Feigel R; Faught W; Fung Kee Fung M
Biopolymers; 2002; 67(6):376-86. PubMed ID: 12209445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of three different methods for automated classification of cervical cells.
Palcic B; MacAulay C; Shlien S; Treurniet W; Tezcan H; Anderson G
Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Nov; 4(6):429-41. PubMed ID: 1280993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Cytophotometric and automated cytodiagnosis].
Böcking A
Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():91-102. PubMed ID: 6578409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigation of a modified gallocyanin chrome alum staining technique in cytology compared to thionine and haematoxylin as nuclear stains.
Schulte E
Acta Histochem Suppl; 1988; 36():341-52. PubMed ID: 2471227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Foundations for differential cytology of cervical changes. 1. Introduction and methods (author's transl)].
Höffken H; Rummel HH
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1981; 103(24):1489-99. PubMed ID: 6176088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Endocervical columnar cell atypia coincident with cervical neoplasia characterized by digital image analysis.
Rosenthal DL; McLatchie C; Stern E; White BS; Castleman KR
Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 7044016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Segmentation of Papanicolaou smear images.
Lin YK; Fu KS
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Sep; 3(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 7294539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Glutathione S-transferase pi is expressed in (pre) neoplastic lesions of the human uterine cervix irrespective of their degree of severity.
Martens JE; Smedts F; ter Harmsel B; Helmerhorst TJ; Ramaekers FC
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(6D):4305-9. PubMed ID: 9494525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of single-cell classification schemes for computer classification of cervical cells.
Poulsen RS; Oliver LH; Toussaint GT; Louis C
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Sep; 3(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 7294540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Carcinoma in situ specimen classification based on intermediate cell measurements.
Katzko MW; Pahlplatz MM; Oud PS; Vooijs GP
Cytometry; 1987 Jan; 8(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 3803099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predictive value of morphological nuclear parameters and DNA ploidy pattern in precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Kashyap V; Luthra UK
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1995 Apr; 38(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 8919109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cytomorphometric differences among individual "moderate dysplasia" cells derived from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Rosenthal DL; Suffin SC; Missirlian N; McLatchie C; Castleman KR
Anal Quant Cytol; 1984 Sep; 6(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 6508036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Two-wavelength Feulgen cytophotometry of cells exfoliated from the uterine cervix.
Hrushovetz SB
Acta Cytol; 1969 Oct; 13(10):583-94. PubMed ID: 4186897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Expectation values for low-resolution slit-scan flow prescreening: influence of nuclear shape and DNA density.
Mullaney PF; Mann R; Seger GH; Achatz M
Anal Quant Cytol; 1982 Jun; 4(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 6180664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
