These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 617529)
41. [Comparative study of bioactive calcium phosphate ceramics after implantation in spongy bone in dogs. Histologic, ultrastructural and electron probe microanalysis]. Daculsi G; Passuti N; Martin S; Le Nihouannen JC; Brulliard V; Delecrin J; Kerebel B Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1989; 75(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 2740538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Remodelling dynamics of cortical bone under the influence of ceramic implants in sheep. Krempien B; Griss P; Heimke G; von Andrian-Werburg H; Hartung HJ; Repia S; Lauterbach HJ Acta Orthop Belg; 1974; 40(5-6):624-38. PubMed ID: 4469727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Apatite formation on three kinds of bioactive material at an early stage in vivo: a comparative study by transmission electron microscopy. Neo M; Nakamura T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Yamamuro T J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Aug; 27(8):999-1006. PubMed ID: 8408128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Application of porous bioceramic in experimental therapy of bone injuries. III. Dynamics of the callus development at the site of porous bioceramic implantation. Morphological, histochemical and histoenzymological studies. Bieniek J; Kotz J; Bieniek A Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1988; 36(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 3233060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluation of the calcium phosphate ceramic implant by non-invasive techniques. Leichter I; Bloch B Biomaterials; 1992; 13(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 1633222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Clinical usefulness of calcium phosphate ceramics]. de Groot K Zahnarztl Mitt; 1985 Sep; 75(18):1938-40. PubMed ID: 3868256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. In vitro dissolution of Synthos ceramics in an acellular physiological environment. Signs SA; Bajpai PK; Pantano CG; Driskell TD Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1979; 7(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 465624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Porous polymethylmethacrylate as a bone replacement material]. de Wijn JR Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1981 Dec; 88(12):429-36. PubMed ID: 6950233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Results of animal experiments following the use of a new material--biocement--for osteoplasty and fixation of alloimplants]. Raveh J; Stich H; Kehrer B Chirurg; 1982 Nov; 53(11):719-31. PubMed ID: 6761094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Microvascular and histogenic responses to implantation of a porous ceramic into bone. Rhinelander FW; Rouweyha M; Milner JC J Biomed Mater Res; 1971 Jan; 5(1):81-112. PubMed ID: 5554098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Bone graft substitutes. Lane JM West J Med; 1995 Dec; 163(6):565-6. PubMed ID: 8553642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Ceramic-plastic material as a bone substitute. 1963. Smith L Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Sep; (282):4-9. PubMed ID: 1516327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. An evaluation of inert and resorbable ceramics for future clinical orthopedic applications. Hentrich RL; Graves GA; Stein HG; Bajpai PK J Biomed Mater Res; 1971 Jan; 5(1):25-51. PubMed ID: 4995062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Relationship between the roentgenological rate of bone filling one year after bone grafting and the prognosis of the graft]. Minabe M; Tamura T; Sugaya A; Sato H; Tomomatu E; Yamashita O; Sakurai M; Hanai S; Hori T Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1987 Jun; 29(2):557-67. PubMed ID: 3506029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Does piezoceramic influence avian bone formation in the early postoperative phase? Schumacher D; Strunz V; Gross U Biomaterials; 1983 Jul; 4(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 6615985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]