These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 617811)
1. On the cross hearing of spondaic words. Martin FN; Blythe ME J Aud Res; 1977 Oct; 17(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 617811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults. Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Central masking effects on spondee threshold as a function of masker sensation level and masker sound pressure level. Martin FN; Digiovanni D J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 422425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech reception thresholds using conventional vs high-frequency spondees in normals and in subjects with marked high-frequency sensorineural loss. Martin FN; Jansen RM J Aud Res; 1985 Apr; 25(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 3842138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of the guess factor on the speech reception threshold. Burke LE; Nerbonne MA J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(3):87-90. PubMed ID: 299592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of procedures and materials for speech reception thresholds. Robinson DO; Koenigs MJ J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 4(6):227-30. PubMed ID: 511650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monaural vs binaural speech reception threshold and word discrimination scores in the hearing impaired. Siegenthaler BM; Craig CH J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 7052803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution of hearing loss characteristics in a clinical population. Margolis RH; Saly GL Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 18600134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry. Hagerman B Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four spondee threshold procedures: a comparison. Wall LG; Davis LA; Myers DK Ear Hear; 1984; 5(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 6734969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time-compressed spondaic words as a measure of speech reception threshold. Foltner KA; Beasley DS; White SC J Aud Res; 1979 Oct; 19(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 262461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Auditory localization and speech perception in noise. Preliminary study concerning 5 cases of perceptual deafness]. Canévet G; Santon F; Scharf B Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1986; 103(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3706968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study. Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone-conduction speech reception thresholds with the mentally retarded. Johnson CW; Bordenick RM J Aud Res; 1978 Jul; 18(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 755820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]