These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6181884)

  • 21. Physics of chemoreception.
    Berg HC; Purcell EM
    Biophys J; 1977 Nov; 20(2):193-219. PubMed ID: 911982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of nonspecific forces and finite receptor number on rate constants of ligand--cell bound-receptor interactions.
    DeLisi C; Wiegel FW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Sep; 78(9):5569-72. PubMed ID: 6946494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Receptor dissociation constants and the information entropy of membranes coding ligand concentration.
    Getz WM; Lánsky P
    Chem Senses; 2001 Feb; 26(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 11238241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diverse chemotactic responses of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae in the developing (temporal) and stationary (spatial) concentration gradients of folic acid, cAMP, Ca(2+) and Mg(2+).
    Korohoda W; Madeja Z; Sroka J
    Cell Motil Cytoskeleton; 2002 Sep; 53(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 12211112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dictyostelium chemotactic response to spatial and temporal gradients. Theories of the limits of chemotactic sensitivity and of pseudochemotaxis.
    Futrelle RP
    J Cell Biochem; 1982; 18(2):197-212. PubMed ID: 7068779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of the chemotaxis coefficient for human neutrophils in the under-agarose migration assay.
    Tranquillo RT; Zigmond SH; Lauffenburger DA
    Cell Motil Cytoskeleton; 1988; 11(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 3208295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-state model for bacterial chemoreceptor proteins. The role of multiple methylation.
    Asakura S; Honda H
    J Mol Biol; 1984 Jul; 176(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 6748079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adaptation is not required to explain the long-term response of axons to molecular gradients.
    Xu J; Rosoff WJ; Urbach JS; Goodhill GJ
    Development; 2005 Oct; 132(20):4545-52. PubMed ID: 16176951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Forward rate constants for receptor clusters. Variational methods for upper and lower bounds.
    van Opheusden JH; Wiegel FW; Goldstein B
    Biophys Chem; 1984 Oct; 20(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 6498281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Physical limits on cellular sensing of spatial gradients.
    Hu B; Chen W; Rappel WJ; Levine H
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Jul; 105(4):048104. PubMed ID: 20867888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coarse graining Escherichia coli chemotaxis: from multi-flagella propulsion to logarithmic sensing.
    Curk T; Matthäus F; Brill-Karniely Y; Dobnikar J
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2012; 736():381-96. PubMed ID: 22161341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of external concentration fluctuations on leukocyte chemotactic orientation.
    Lauffenburger DA
    Cell Biophys; 1982; 4(2-3):177-209. PubMed ID: 6181883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A computational model for how cells choose temporal or spatial sensing during chemotaxis.
    Tan RZ; Chiam KH
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Mar; 14(3):e1005966. PubMed ID: 29505572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of the rate-limiting step in a ligand-cell receptor interaction: the immunoglobulin E system.
    Wank SA; DeLisi C; Metzger H
    Biochemistry; 1983 Feb; 22(4):954-9. PubMed ID: 6220739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mathematics of experimentally generated chemoattractant gradients.
    Postma M; van Haastert PJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 571():473-88. PubMed ID: 19763986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Protein concentration gradients and switching diffusions.
    Bressloff PC; Lawley SD; Murphy P
    Phys Rev E; 2019 Mar; 99(3-1):032409. PubMed ID: 30999457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis.
    Macnab RM; Koshland DE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1972 Sep; 69(9):2509-12. PubMed ID: 4560688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by cell-surface receptors.
    Endres RG; Wingreen NS
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2009; 100(1-3):33-9. PubMed ID: 19523978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Studies of bacterial chemotaxis in defined concentration gradients. A model for chemotaxis toward L-serine.
    Dahlquist FW; Elwell RA; Lovely PS
    J Supramol Struct; 1976; 4(3):329-42. PubMed ID: 772315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Receptor differential activation and cooperativity better explain cellular preference for different chemoattractant gradient shapes in an EGFR system.
    White JB; Takayama S
    Integr Biol (Camb); 2011 Oct; 3(10):1003-10. PubMed ID: 21918787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.