These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6184684)
21. Development of a closed-loop pacemaker controller regulating mixed venous oxygen saturation level. Inbar GF; Heinze R; Hoekstein KN; Liess HD; Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1988 Sep; 35(9):679-90. PubMed ID: 3169820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Rate modulated pacing based on right ventricular dP/dt: quantitative analysis of chronotropic response. Kay GN; Philippon F; Bubien RS; Plumb VJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Aug; 17(8):1344-54. PubMed ID: 7971396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Physiological benefits of a pacemaker with dual chamber pacing at low heart rates and single chamber rate responsive pacing during exercise. French WJ; Haskell RJ; Wesley GW; Florio J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1840-5. PubMed ID: 2463556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The central venous blood temperature as a guide for rate control in pacemaker therapy. Laczkovics A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Sep; 7(5):822-30. PubMed ID: 6207494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Physiological importance of different atrioventricular intervals to improved exercise performance in patients with dual chamber pacemakers. Haskell RJ; French WJ Br Heart J; 1989 Jan; 61(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 2917098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The value of DDD pacing in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Geelen P; Lorga Filho A; Chauvin M; Wellens F; Brugada P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):177-81. PubMed ID: 9121985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Single versus double chamber rate responsive cardiac pacing: comparison by cardiopulmonary noninvasive exercise testing. Vogt P; Goy JJ; Kuhn M; Leuenberger P; Kappenberger L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1896-901. PubMed ID: 2463564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays. Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Permanent variable frequency cardiac pacing: which patients with chronic complete atrioventricular block profit most?]. Lukl J; Doupal V; Heinc P; Hyzák A Vnitr Lek; 1992 Mar; 38(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 1595213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical evaluation of peak endocardial acceleration as a sensor for rate responsive pacing. Greco EM; Ferrario M; Romano S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Apr; 26(4 Pt 1):812-8. PubMed ID: 12715840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics. Rickli H; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Maccarter DJ; Duru F; Candinas R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10709225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Single- versus dual-chamber sensor-driven pacing: comparison of cardiac outputs. Proctor EE; Leman RB; Mann DL; Kaiser J; Kratz J; Gillette P Am Heart J; 1991 Sep; 122(3 Pt 1):728-32. PubMed ID: 1877449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation by exercise Doppler echocardiography of maintenance of cardiac output during ventricular pacing with or without chronotropic response. Iwase M; Hatano K; Saito F; Kato K; Maeda M; Miyaguchi K; Aoki T; Yokota M; Hayashi H; Saito H Am J Cardiol; 1989 Apr; 63(13):934-8. PubMed ID: 2929467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]