These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6185530)

  • 1. Comparison of methods for cultivation and isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Benes S; McCormack WM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Nov; 16(5):847-50. PubMed ID: 6185530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of various cell culture procedures for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and applicability to diagnosis of pediatric infections.
    La Scolea LJ; Keddell JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Apr; 13(4):705-8. PubMed ID: 7014620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells.
    Ripa KT; Mårdh PA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Oct; 6(4):328-31. PubMed ID: 562356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of various McCoy cell treatment procedures used for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Evans RT; Taylor-Robinson D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 389948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancement of Chlamydia trachomatis infectious progeny by cultivation of HeLa 229 cells treated with DEAE-dextran and cycloheximide.
    Sabet SF; Simmons J; Caldwell HD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 20(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 6208215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from patients of southeastern venereal disease clinic.
    Bradley BS; Fisher LM; Dalton HP
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jun; 73(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 6893105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of HeLa 229 and McCoy cell cultures for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.
    Thewessen EA; Freundt I; van Rijsoort-Vos JH; Stolz E; Michel MF; Wagenvoort JH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1399-400. PubMed ID: 2754009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity of mitomycin-C treated McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.
    Woodland RM; Kirton RP; Darougar S
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 6(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 3126059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suppression of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion formation by fetal calf serum in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells.
    Evans RT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Apr; 11(4):424-5. PubMed ID: 6989860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of cycloheximide on the infective yield of a genital strain of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells.
    Karayiannis P; Hobson D; Lee N
    Infect Immun; 1981 Jul; 33(1):309-11. PubMed ID: 7263068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved method for isolation and growth of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells treated with cycloheximide using polyethylene glycol.
    Mohammed NR; Hillary IB
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Sep; 38(9):1052-4. PubMed ID: 3900144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the sensitivity of immunofluorescence and Giemsa for staining Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells.
    Munday PE; Johnson AP; Thomas BJ; Taylor-Robinson D
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Feb; 33(2):177-9. PubMed ID: 6988463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A nonculture test for identification of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Amortegui AJ; Meyer MP
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Mar; 30(3 Suppl):279-83. PubMed ID: 3894657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different culture media for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture on HeLa cells.
    Herbrink P; Zuyderwijk-Zwinkels M; Niesters B; Wagenvoort J; Van Dijk W
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991 Aug; 10(8):656-9. PubMed ID: 1748120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Buffalo green monkey kidney cells and McCoy cells for the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis in shell vial centrifugation culture.
    Johnston SL; Siegel C
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(4):355-7. PubMed ID: 1611851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two commercially available isolation systems for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Baselski VS; Robison MK; Jennings BR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):476-9. PubMed ID: 6630436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microtest procedure for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Yoder BL; Stamm WE; Koester CM; Alexander ER
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):1036-9. PubMed ID: 7019235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine-treated cells.
    Wentworth BB; Alexander ER
    Appl Microbiol; 1974 May; 27(5):912-6. PubMed ID: 4598224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiology Diagnosis of chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Ripa KT
    Infection; 1982; 10 Suppl 1():S19-24. PubMed ID: 6177643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of cortisol on the growth of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells.
    Bushell AC; Hobson D
    Infect Immun; 1978 Sep; 21(3):946-53. PubMed ID: 711342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.