BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6186481)

  • 1. Comparative carcinogenic potencies of particulates from diesel engine exhausts, coke oven emissions, roofing tar aerosols and cigarette smoke.
    Albert RE
    Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Jan; 47():339-41. PubMed ID: 6186481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mouse skin tumours and human lung cancer: relationships with complex environmental emissions.
    Nesnow S
    IARC Sci Publ; 1990; (104):44-54. PubMed ID: 2228143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metabolic activation of organic extracts from diesel, coke oven, roofing tar, and cigarette smoke emissions in the Ames assay.
    Williams K; Lewtas J
    Environ Mutagen; 1985; 7(4):489-500. PubMed ID: 2414095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutagenicity of the fractionated organic emissions from diesel, cigarette smoke condensate, coke oven, and roofing tar in the Ames assay.
    Austin AC; Claxton LD; Lewtas J
    Environ Mutagen; 1985; 7(4):471-87. PubMed ID: 2414094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative characterization of organic emissions from diesel particles, coke oven mains, roofing tar vapors and cigarette smoke condensate.
    Williams R; Sparacino C; Petersen B; Bumgarner J; Jungers RH; Lewtas J
    Int J Environ Anal Chem; 1986; 26(1):27-49. PubMed ID: 3804556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mouse skin tumor initiation-promotion and complete carcinogenesis bioassays: mechanisms and biological activities of emission samples.
    Nesnow S; Triplett LL; Slaga TJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Jan; 47():255-68. PubMed ID: 6825618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a comparative potency method for cancer risk assessment of complex mixtures using short-term in vivo and in vitro bioassays.
    Lewtas J
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1985 Dec; 1(4):193-203. PubMed ID: 3843500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative significance of different hydrocarbons for the carcinogenic potency of emissions from various incomplete combustion processes.
    Pott F; Heinrich U
    IARC Sci Publ; 1990; (104):288-97. PubMed ID: 1699890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Carcinogenic effect of tobacco smoke].
    Starek A; Podolak I
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2009; 60(4):299-310. PubMed ID: 20361554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of motor vehicle emissions in short-term bioassays.
    Lewtas J
    Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Jan; 47():141-52. PubMed ID: 6186475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The changing cigarette, 1950-1995.
    Hoffmann D; Hoffmann I
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Mar; 50(4):307-64. PubMed ID: 9120872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of tobacco carcinogenesis XX: mastocytoma induction in mice by cigarette smoke particulates ("cigarette tar").
    Ohmori T; Mori H; Rivenson A
    Am J Pathol; 1981 Mar; 102(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 6782887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of coke oven emissions exposure among coking workers.
    Chen ML; Mao IF; Wu MT; Chen JR; Ho CK; Smith TJ; Wypij D; Christiani DC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 10028622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Respiratory carcinogenicity of diesel fuel emissions. Interim results.
    Shefner AM; Collins BR; Dooley L; Fiks A; Graf JL; Preache MM
    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1982; 10():329-50. PubMed ID: 6176431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CARCINOGENIC ACTIVITY OF CIGARETTE SMOKE CONDENSATE. 3. BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF REFINED TAR FROM SEVERAL TYPES OF CIGARETTES.
    BOCK FG; MOORE GE; CLARK PC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1965 Apr; 34():481-93. PubMed ID: 14317642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Distribution, formation, carcinogenic and mutagenic activities of nitro derivatives of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons].
    Khesina AIa; Makhover MS; Khitrovo IA
    Eksp Onkol; 1989; 11(2):3-8. PubMed ID: 2661203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dermal carcinogenesis bioassays of diesel particulates and dichloromethane extract of diesel particulates in C3H mice.
    Depass LR; Chen KC; Peterson LG
    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1982; 10():321-7. PubMed ID: 6176430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study by electron paramagnetic resonance of free radical species in the mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes with conventional acetate filters and 'bio-filters'.
    Valavanidis A; Haralambous E
    Redox Rep; 2001; 6(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 11523591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A critical assessment of studies on the carcinogenic potential of diesel exhaust.
    Hesterberg TW; Bunn WB; Chase GR; Valberg PA; Slavin TJ; Lapin CA; Hart GA
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 36(9):727-76. PubMed ID: 17050083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of carcinogenic hazard of diesel engine exhaust needs to consider revolutionary changes in diesel technology.
    McClellan RO; Hesterberg TW; Wall JC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 63(2):225-58. PubMed ID: 22561182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.