These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Comparative evaluation of various methods of continuous electric stimulation of the heart in bradycardia]. Drogaĭtsev AD Kardiologiia; 1990 Feb; 30(2):5-11. PubMed ID: 2348620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A double-blind study of submaximal exercise tolerance and variation in paced rate in atrial synchronous compared to activity sensor modulated ventricular pacing. Linde-Edelstam C; Nordlander R; Pehrsson SK; Rydén L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jun; 15(6):905-15. PubMed ID: 1376903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview. Sukhum P Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effects of ventricular demand and dual-chamber pacing models on the long-term clinical outcome and cardiac remodeling in patients with symptomatic bradycardia]. Dong YX; Guo M; Yang YZ; Gao LJ; Cha YM; Xie ZZ; Zhang SL; Sun YH; Wang YQ; Xia YL; Boodhna J Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 91(30):2103-7. PubMed ID: 22093984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atrial sensing and AV synchrony in single lead VDD pacemakers: a prospective comparison to DDD devices with bipolar atrial leads. Wiegand UK; Bode F; Schneider R; Taubert G; Brandes A; Peters W; Katus HA; Potratz J J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 10(4):513-20. PubMed ID: 10355692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative functional effects of chronic ventricular demand and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Yee R; Benditt DG; Kostuk WJ; Ko PT; Purves P; Klein GJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Jan; 7(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 6199764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single versus dual chamber pacing in the young: noninvasive comparative evaluation of cardiac function. Horenstein MS; Karpawich PP; Tantengco MV Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 May; 26(5):1208-11. PubMed ID: 12765448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature. Sutton R; Bourgeois I Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. VDD(R) pacing: short- and long-term stability of atrial sensing with a single lead system. Naegeli B; Osswald S; Pfisterer M; Burkart F Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 19(4 Pt 1):455-64. PubMed ID: 8848393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Kruse I; Arnman K; Conradson TB; Rydén L Circulation; 1982 May; 65(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 7074746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total sympathetic activity and atrial natriuretic factor levels in VVI and DDD pacing with different atrioventricular delays during daily activity and exercise. Theodorakis GN; Kremastinos DT; Markianos M; Livanis E; Karavolias G; Toutouzas PK Eur Heart J; 1992 Nov; 13(11):1477-81. PubMed ID: 1334465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrioventricular block after atrioventricular synchronized pacing. Kong CW; Yu WC; Chen SA; Lin YJ; Huang CY; Chung SL Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Mar; 27(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 15009862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block]. Lemke B; Gude J; von Dryander S; Barmeyer J; Braun BE; Krieg M Z Kardiol; 1990 Aug; 79(8):547-56. PubMed ID: 2145704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Right atrial pacing impairs cardiac function during resynchronization therapy: acute effects of DDD pacing compared to VDD pacing. Bernheim A; Ammann P; Sticherling C; Burger P; Schaer B; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Eckstein J; Kiencke S; Kaiser C; Linka A; Buser P; Pfisterer M; Osswald S J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 May; 45(9):1482-7. PubMed ID: 15862423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block. Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-chamber ventricular pacing increases markers of left ventricular dysfunction compared with dual-chamber pacing. Naegeli B; Kurz DJ; Koller D; Straumann E; Furrer M; Maurer D; Minder E; Bertel O Europace; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 17272326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemodynamic comparison of ventricular pacing, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculography. Videen JS; Huang SK; Bazgan ID; Mechling E; Patton DD Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jun; 57(15):1305-8. PubMed ID: 3717030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of sinus node disease in patients with AV block: implications for single lead VDD pacing. Wiegand UK; Bode F; Schneider R; Brandes A; Haase H; Katus HA; Potratz J Heart; 1999 Jun; 81(6):580-5. PubMed ID: 10336914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]