These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Electrochemical properties of platinum, glassy carbon, and pyrographite as stimulating electrodes. Mund K; Richter G; Weidlich E; Fahlström U Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Nov; 9(6):1225-9. PubMed ID: 2432538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Activated pyrolytic carbon tip pacing leads: an alternative to steroid-eluting pacing leads? Masini M; Lazzari M; Lorenzoni R; Domicelli AM; Micheletti A; Dianda R; Masini G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1832-5. PubMed ID: 8945051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pacemaker electrodes and problems related to cardiac pacing and sensing: current solutions and future trends. Pioger G; Garberoglio B Life Support Syst; 1984; 2(3):169-81. PubMed ID: 6503346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of platinized grooved electrode performance with ring-tip electrodes. Midei MG; Jones BR; Brinker JA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 May; 12(5):752-6. PubMed ID: 2471160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulation characteristics of a steroid-eluting electrode compared with three conventional electrodes. Klein HH; Steinberger J; Knake W Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Feb; 13(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 1689827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening of solid and porous materials for pacemaker electrodes. Hirshorn MS; Holley LK; Hales JR; Money DK; Young FA; Spector M; Wickham GG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1981 Jul; 4(4):380-90. PubMed ID: 6167955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical experience with 910 carbon tip leads: comparison with polished platinum leads. Mugica J; Henry L; Attuel P; Lazarus B; Duconge R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Nov; 9(6 Pt 2):1230-8. PubMed ID: 2432539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chronic animal testing of new cardiac pacing electrodes. Adler S; Spehr P; Allen J; Block W Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1896-900. PubMed ID: 1704563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term threshold stability with porous tip electrodes. Gould L; Patel C; Becker W Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Nov; 9(6):1202-5. PubMed ID: 2432533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histological evaluation of porous titanium cardiac pacemaker electrode tips. Hirshorn MS; Holley LK; Money DK; Spector M; Young FA; Hales JR J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Jan; 18(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 6699032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acute and chronic pulse-width thresholds in solid versus porous tip electrodes. Breivik K; Ohm OJ; Engedal H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1982 Sep; 5(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 6182535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Some aspects of energy-saving pacing in the light of the author's studies]. Machejek J; Machejek J; Lelakowska-Pieła M; Engel A; Domaracki D; Lelakowski J Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2015 Aug; 39(230):81-5. PubMed ID: 26319380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical results of low energy unipolar or bipolar activated carbon tip leads. Pioger G; Ripart A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Nov; 9(6 Pt 2):1243-8. PubMed ID: 2432541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]