205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6189701)
1. Effect of contralateral and ipsilateral masking of acoustic stimulation on the latencies of auditory evoked potentials from cochlea and brain stem.
Boezeman EH; Kapteyn TS; Visser SL; Snel AM
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jun; 55(6):710-3. PubMed ID: 6189701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by clicks in notch-filtered masking noise.
Pratt H; Bleich N
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 6175503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory brainstem responses: masking related changes in wave VI.
Reid A; Birchall JP; Moffat DA
Br J Audiol; 1984 Feb; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6722368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-pass and notch noise masking in suprathreshold brainstem response audiometry.
Laukli E
Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 6612212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig].
Dum N; von Wedel H
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Dec; 63(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 6521594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the latencies between bone and air conduction in the auditory brain stem evoked potential.
Boezeman EH; Kapteyn TS; Visser SL; Snel AM
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Aug; 56(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 6191955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maturational changes in the intensity latency relation of the brainstem auditory evoked potentials in humans.
Collet L; Morgon A; Soares I; Disant F; Salle B
Acta Otolaryngol; 1988; 105(5-6):473-6. PubMed ID: 3400449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrically and acoustically evoked brain stem responses in guinea pig.
Gyo K; Yanagihara N
Acta Otolaryngol; 1980; 90(1-2):25-31. PubMed ID: 7446077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evoked auditory potentials using electric stimulation of the ear. Experimental study].
Charlet de Sauvage R
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1983; 104(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 6878917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Binaural interaction of the auditory brain-stem potentials and middle latency auditory evoked potentials in infants and adults.
McPherson DL; Tures C; Starr A
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 74(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 2465887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Derived brain stem responses by means of pure-tone masking.
Pantev C; Pantev M
Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 7178798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compound impulse response for the brain stem derived through combinations of cochlear and brain stem recordings.
Elberling C
Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(3):147-57. PubMed ID: 756079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developmental dependencies of the human brainstem auditory evoked response.
Hecox K; Burkard R
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():538-56. PubMed ID: 6284002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Response enhancement and reduction of the auditory brain-stem response in a forward-masking paradigm.
Ananthanarayan AK; Gerken GM
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 66(4):427-39. PubMed ID: 2435523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Auditory potentials of the brain stem masked by continuous wide-band noise].
Prosser S; Arslan E
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1983; 3(6):679-86. PubMed ID: 6675418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between auditory brain stem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks.
Tietze G; Pantev C
Audiology; 1986; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 3954683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electric response audiometry in a clinical practice.
Brackmann DE
Laryngoscope; 1977 May; 87(5 Pt 2 Suppl 5):1-33. PubMed ID: 323607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal masking of auditory evoked brainstem responses in human newborns and adults.
Lasky RE; Rupert AL
Hear Res; 1982 Apr; 6(3):315-34. PubMed ID: 7085488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain stem response evoked by electrical stimulation of the round window of the guinea pig.
Yamane H; Marsh RR; Potsic WP
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1981; 89(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 6784069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: significant latency differences between ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation.
Prasher DK; Gibson WP
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Nov; 50(3-4):240-6. PubMed ID: 6160965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
