These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6190632)

  • 1. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 56(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 6190632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cuffin BN; Cohen D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Aug; 47(2):132-46. PubMed ID: 95707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN; Yunokuchi K; Maniewski R; Purcell C; Cosgrove GR; Ives J; Kennedy JG; Schomer DL
    Ann Neurol; 1990 Dec; 28(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 2285267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: a comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods.
    Murro AM; Smith JR; King DW; Park YD
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 8793122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1362-5. PubMed ID: 24109949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MEG and EEG dipole clusters from extended cortical sources.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Tech R; Wagner M; Gasca F
    Biomed Eng Lett; 2017 Aug; 7(3):185-191. PubMed ID: 30603165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method for combining MEG and EEG to determine the sources.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Jan; 32(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 3823144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 1793693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Localization of partial epilepsy using magnetic and electric measurements.
    Sutherling WW; Levesque MF; Crandall PH; Barth DS
    Epilepsia; 1991; 32 Suppl 5():S29-40. PubMed ID: 1743168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
    Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined EEG and MEG analysis of early somatosensory evoked activity in children and adolescents with focal epilepsies.
    Bast T; Wright T; Boor R; Harting I; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Hoechstetter K; Rating D; Baumgärtner U
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1721-35. PubMed ID: 17572142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Source analysis of EEG oscillations using high-resolution EEG and MEG.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Nunez PL
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 159():29-42. PubMed ID: 17071222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dipole theory and electroencephalography.
    Niedermeyer E
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 1996 Jul; 27(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 8828975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.