These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 619521)
1. Substitute cardiac valves. Advantages and disadvantages of four commonly used ones. Roberts WC Adv Cardiol; 1978; (22):252-70. PubMed ID: 619521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implantation of homologous and heterologous aortic valves in prosthetic vascular tubes. Duran CM; Whitehead R; Gunning AJ Thorax; 1969 Mar; 24(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 5821617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac valvular replacement: role of the aortic homograft. Angell WW; Shumway NE Annu Rev Med; 1968; 19():207-16. PubMed ID: 4871688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative evaluation of different methods of sterilization of allo- and xenovalves under experimental conditions]. Iaroshinskiĭ IuN; Artiukhina TV; Fursov BA Eksp Khir Anesteziol; 1974; (2):35-8. PubMed ID: 4459083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The present status of artificial heart valves. Björk VO Adv Biomed Eng Med Phys; 1970; 3():259-60. PubMed ID: 5527791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Preparation and preservation of homologous and heterologous aortic valve transplants. Histological and clinical results]. Stutte HJ; Bernhard A; Thiele F Zentralbl Chir; 1969 Jan; 94(2):33-45. PubMed ID: 5371271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From valvular xenograft to valvular bioprosthesis (1965-1977). Carpentier A Med Instrum; 1977; 11(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 404516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of autologous, homologous and heterologous valves. O'Brien MF Med J Aust; 1972 Aug; 2(1):Suppl:51. PubMed ID: 4637365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The tissue valve as a superior cardiac valve replacement. Angell WW; Angell JD; Sywak A; Kosek JC Surgery; 1977 Dec; 82(6):875-87. PubMed ID: 412262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Porcine aortic valves as replacements for human heart valves. Zuhdi N; Hawley W; Voehl V; Hancock W; Carey J; Greer A Ann Thorac Surg; 1974 May; 17(5):479-91. PubMed ID: 4207352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A pulsatile flow study comparing the Hancock porcine xenograft aortic valve prostheses models 242 and 250. Wright JT Med Instrum; 1977; 11(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 859469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal diameter of the stent for aortic valvular grafts. I. Studies on valve function and geometry. Trenkner M; Raczyński S; Gutkowski R J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1976 Oct; 72(4):612-7. PubMed ID: 966796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study between glutaraldehyde-preserved aortic and pulmonary heterograft valves in the tricuspid position in dogs. Okamura K; Yuge I; Kawazoe K; Kitamura N; Imamura E; Koyanagi H; Konno S J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1976; 17(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 816800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Morphological changes in aortic valve xenografts from swine]. Tószegi A; Kovács G; Ormos J Orv Hetil; 1976 Nov; 117(47):2851-5. PubMed ID: 995383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac valve replacement with the glutaraldehyde preserved porcine heterograft. Phillips SJ; Zeff RH; Kongtahworn C J Iowa Med Soc; 1977 Feb; 67(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 402430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Use of a frame-reinforced formalin-preserved swine aortic valve with a section of ascending aorta and anterior mitral flap for the correction of the outlet portion of the right heart]. Solov'ev GM; Kisis SIa; Postnikov AA; Chernov VA Kardiologiia; 1974 Jul; 14(7):66-72. PubMed ID: 4431142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]