These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6195602)

  • 1. Self-inhibition of an AV sequential demand (DVI) pulse generator due to polyurethane lead insulation disruption.
    Sanford CF
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Sep; 6(5 Pt 1):840-4. PubMed ID: 6195602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. False inhibition of an atrial demand pacemaker caused by an insulation defect in a polyurethane lead.
    van Gelder LM; El Gamal MI
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Sep; 6(5 Pt 1):834-9. PubMed ID: 6195601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Galvanic element produced by defective electrode insulation--a possible cause of abnormal pulse generator inhibition.
    Levander-Lindgren M; Sylvén JC; Thorén A
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983; 17(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 6867647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pacemaker rhythms. Apparent VVI (or ? VOO) pacing by AV sequential demand (DVI) pulse generator.
    Barold SS; Falkoff MD; Ong LS; Heinle RA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1981 May; 4(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 6169026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pacemaker inhibition due to anodal ring electrode contact.
    Henderson D; Maher M; Johnson D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Dec; 18(12 Pt 1):2222-4. PubMed ID: 8771137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview.
    Sukhum P
    Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suppression of ventricular output by noise in the atrial channel in a dual chamber pacemaker.
    Ben-Zur UM; Kahn S; Gross JN; Platt SB; Goodfriend MA; Furman S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1586-8. PubMed ID: 7479181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term comparison of the electrical characteristics of polyurethane and polyethylene insulated ventricular leads.
    Bluhm G; Larsen FF; Nordlander R; Pehrsson SK
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 May; 13(5):583-7. PubMed ID: 1693194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator with permanent unipolar pacemakers: preliminary observations.
    Haffajee C; Casavant D; Desai P; Moon R; Voukydis P; Pacetti P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Feb; 19(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 8834682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chronic steroid-eluting lead performance: a comparison of atrial and ventricular pacing.
    Hua W; Mond HG; Strathmore N
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 1):17-24. PubMed ID: 9121966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. VDD pacing with a previously implanted single lead system.
    Nakata Y; Ogura S; Tokano T; Yasuda M; Ohno Y; Hisaoka T; Sumiyoshi M; Nakazato Y; Yamaguchi H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1425-9. PubMed ID: 1383952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artifacts recorded through failing bipolar polyurethane insulated permanent pacing leads.
    Rosenheck S; Sharon Z; Leibowitz D
    Europace; 2000 Jan; 2(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11225597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretation of electrocardiograms produced by a new unipolar multiprogrammable "committed" AV sequential demand (DVI) pulse generator.
    Barold SS; Falkoff MD; Ong LS; Heinle RA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1981 Nov; 4(6):692-708. PubMed ID: 6173859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P-wave sensing in VVI pacemakers: useful or a problem?
    van Gelder LM; el Gamal MI; Tielen CH
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 2462217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience and implantation techniques with a new single-pass lead VDD pacing system.
    Longo E; Catrini V
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jul; 13(7):927-36. PubMed ID: 1695750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation].
    Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
    Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative evaluation of various methods of continuous electric stimulation of the heart in bradycardia].
    Drogaĭtsev AD
    Kardiologiia; 1990 Feb; 30(2):5-11. PubMed ID: 2348620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant experience with unipolar polyurethane pacing leads.
    Byrd CL; McArthur W; Stokes K; Sivina M; Yahr WZ; Greenberg J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Sep; 6(5 Pt 1):869-82. PubMed ID: 6195605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of prophylactic epicardial pacing leads in children and young adults.
    Cohen MI; Rhodes LA; Spray TL; Gaynor JW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jul; 78(1):197-202; discussion 202-3. PubMed ID: 15223427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of atrial capture in committed atrioventricular sequential (DVI) pacing systems.
    Levine PA; Brodsky SJ; Seltzer JP
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 May; 6(3 Pt 1):616-23. PubMed ID: 6191300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.