123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6195755)
1. Five-year results after randomized mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley. Lillehei-Kaster, and Starr-Edwards prostheses.
Horstkotte D; Haerten K; Herzer JA; Loogen F; Scheibling R; Schulte HD
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Aug; 31(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 6195755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses.
Brawley RK; Donahoo JS; Gott VL
Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 124127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experience with surgery of the heart valves.
Björk VO
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1976; 65(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 962282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Hemodynamics after mitral valve replacement with Starr-Edwards, Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster protheses (author's transl)].
Haerten K; Both A; Lück J; Herzer J; Loogen F
Z Kardiol; 1977 May; 66(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 878552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Randomized, prospective, clinical study comparing the Björk-Shiley, Lillehei-Kaster and Angell-Shiley prostheses in the mitral position].
Vallejo JL
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1981; 34(6):457-63. PubMed ID: 7339726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term follow-up in 185 patients after mitral valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis. Overall results and prosthesis-related complications.
Olesen KH; Rygg IH; Wennevold A; Nyboe J
Eur Heart J; 1987 Jul; 8(7):680-8. PubMed ID: 3653119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical results of the Starr-Edwards ball valve for mitral valve replacement].
Suma K; Takeuchi Y; Inoue K; Shiroma K; Koyama Y; Narumi J; Kaneko H; Nishiyama K; Tsuji T; Kotsuka H
Kyobu Geka; 1985 Mar; 38(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 3999483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term survival after tricuspid valve replacement. Results with seven different prostheses.
Jugdutt BI; Fraser RS; Lee SJ; Rossall RE; Callaghan JC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977 Jul; 74(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 141548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Results of valve substitution with the Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster oscillating-disc prostheses].
Casarotto D; Bortolotti U; Betti D; Chioin R; Rizzoli G; de Mozzi P; Gallucci V
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1979; 27(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 471231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic valve replacement. A randomized study comparing the Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster disc valves. Peroperative haemodynamic evaluation and early results.
Levang OW
Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978; 12(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 725560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve replacements].
Mühlberger V; Schistek R; Hopferwieser T; Schwaiger A; Scharfetter H; Knapp E
Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun; 75(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 3751218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mitral valve replacement. A comparative clinical and haemodynamic study of the new Lillehei-Kaster and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
Nitter-Hauge S; Hall KV; Froysaker T
Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977; 11(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 897617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined mitral and aortic valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease: fifteen-year follow up and long-term results.
Panda BR; Shankar R; Kuruvilla KT; Philip MA; Thankachen R; Shukla V; Korula RJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Mar; 18(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 19455892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ten to fifteen year reassessment of the performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards Model 6120 mitral valve prosthesis.
Miller DC; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Reitz BA; Jamieson SW; Baumgartner WA; Mitchell RS; Shumway NE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Jan; 85(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 6848878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves.
Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of valve type and valve function on chronic intravascular hemolysis after alloprosthetic mitral and aortic valve replacement].
Horstkotte D; Aul C; Seipel L; Körfer R; Budde T; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
Z Kardiol; 1983 Feb; 72(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 6845808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
