These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6198369)

  • 1. Improvements in medicated tulle dressings.
    Thomas S; Dawes CE; Hay NP
    J Hosp Infect; 1983 Dec; 4(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 6198369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A povidone-iodine medicated dressing.
    Lawrence JC
    J Wound Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):332-6. PubMed ID: 9791357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antimicrobial properties of antiseptic-impregnated biological dressings.
    Kearney JN; Arain T; Holland KT
    J Hosp Infect; 1988 Jan; 11(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 2895140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro antibacterial properties of providone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinses.
    Addy M; Wright R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1978 Aug; 5(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 279548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities.
    Hill KE; Malic S; McKee R; Rennison T; Harding KG; Williams DW; Thomas DW
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of lipidocolloid and chlorhexidine-impregnated tulle gras dressings following microscopically controlled surgery.
    Hessam S; Georgas D; Sand M; Kassa T; Bruns N; Bechara FG
    J Wound Care; 2015 Mar; 24(3):135; 138-9. PubMed ID: 25764958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antimicrobial dressings: Comparison of the ability of a panel of dressings to prevent biofilm formation by key burn wound pathogens.
    Halstead FD; Rauf M; Bamford A; Wearn CM; Bishop JRB; Burt R; Fraise AP; Moiemen NS; Oppenheim BA; Webber MA
    Burns; 2015 Dec; 41(8):1683-1694. PubMed ID: 26188884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-extraction bacteraemia: role of antiseptics and antibiotics.
    Macfarlane TW; Ferguson MM; Mulgrew CJ
    Br Dent J; 1984 Mar; 156(5):179-81. PubMed ID: 6584133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Advances in the research of antibacterial composite dressings based on bacterial cellulose].
    Luo ZH; Zhang JP
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 May; 34(5):314-317. PubMed ID: 29804430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of antibacterial effects of different antiseptics after hand washing].
    Buluş N; Kaleli I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004; 38(1-2):137-43. PubMed ID: 15293913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alcohol-based chlorhexidine vs. povidone iodine in reducing skin colonization prior to regional anesthesia procedures.
    Krobbuaban B; Diregpoke S; Prasan S; Thanomsat M; Kumkeaw S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Jul; 94(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 21774287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate containing detergents for disinfection of hands.
    Hall R
    J Hosp Infect; 1980 Dec; 1(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 6182243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of an ozonated oil with chlorhexidine digluconate and povidone-iodine. A disk diffusion test.
    Montevecchi M; Dorigo A; Cricca M; Checchi L
    New Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 36(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 23912871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of chlorhexidine surgical scrub compared to that of hexachlorophene and povidone-lodine.
    Paul JW; Gordon MA
    Vet Med Small Anim Clin; 1978 May; 73(5):573-6, 579. PubMed ID: 354176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Topical chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine and erythromycin in the repair of traumatic ulcers on the rat tongue: Clinical, histological and microbiological evaluation.
    Teixeira DDS; de Figueiredo MAZ; Cherubini K; Garcia MCR; de Oliveira SD; Salum FG
    Arch Oral Biol; 2018 Mar; 87():218-225. PubMed ID: 29316457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of bactericidal properties of alcohol-based chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine prior to amniocentesis.
    Adler MT; Brigger KR; Bishop KD; Mastrobattista JM
    Am J Perinatol; 2012 Jun; 29(6):455-8. PubMed ID: 22399217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note on an in vitro test system to compare the bactericidal properties of wound dressings.
    Holland KT; Davis W
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1985 Jul; 59(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 3928570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pre-clinical evaluation of silver, iodine and Manuka honey based dressings in a model of traumatic extremity wounds contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus.
    Guthrie HC; Martin KR; Taylor C; Spear AM; Whiting R; Macildowie S; Clasper JC; Watts SA
    Injury; 2014 Aug; 45(8):1171-8. PubMed ID: 24908627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of gauze soaked in povidone iodine for dressing acute open wounds.
    Misra A; Nanchahal J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 111(6):2105-7. PubMed ID: 12711982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of four film-type dressings by their anti-microbial effect on the flora of the skin.
    Wille JC; Blussé van Oud Alblas A
    J Hosp Infect; 1989 Aug; 14(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 2572632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.