231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6199764)
1. Comparative functional effects of chronic ventricular demand and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.
Yee R; Benditt DG; Kostuk WJ; Ko PT; Purves P; Klein GJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Jan; 7(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 6199764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac output in single-lead VDD pacing versus rate-matched VVIR pacing.
Nowak B; Voigtländer T; Himmrich E; Liebrich A; Poschmann G; Epperlein S; Treese N; Meyer J
Am J Cardiol; 1995 May; 75(14):904-7. PubMed ID: 7732998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.
Kruse I; Arnman K; Conradson TB; Rydén L
Circulation; 1982 May; 65(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 7074746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Respiration-dependent ventricular pacing compared with fixed ventricular and atrial-ventricular synchronous pacing: aerobic and hemodynamic variables.
Rossi P; Rognoni G; Occhetta E; Aina F; Prando MD; Plicchi G; Minella M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 4031276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemodynamic comparison of ventricular pacing, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculography.
Videen JS; Huang SK; Bazgan ID; Mechling E; Patton DD
Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jun; 57(15):1305-8. PubMed ID: 3717030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical work capacity with rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVIR) versus dual chamber pacing (DDD) in patients with normal and diminished left ventricular function.
Frielingsdorf J; Dür P; Gerber AE; Vuilliomenet A; Bertel O
Int J Cardiol; 1995 May; 49(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 7649670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of heart rate response during exercise in patients using atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacemakers.
McMeekin JD; Lautner D; Hanson S; Gulamhusein SS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 1689036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preimplantation echo Doppler evaluation of VVI versus DDD pacing.
Soussou AI; Helmy MG; Guindy RR
Echocardiography; 1995 Jul; 12(4):335-49. PubMed ID: 10150780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The haemodynamic importance of atrioventricular synchrony and rate increase at rest and during exercise.
Kristensson BE; Arnman K; Rydén L
Eur Heart J; 1985 Sep; 6(9):773-8. PubMed ID: 4076212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement of exercise tolerance by single lead VDD pacemaker: evaluation using cardiopulmonary exercise test.
Ijiri H; Komori S; Kohno I; Sano S; Yin D; Takusagawa M; Iida T; Yamamoto K; Osada M; Sawanobori T; Ishihara T; Umetani K; Tamura K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Sep; 23(9):1336-42. PubMed ID: 11025888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing in ischaemic heart disease.
Kristensson BE; Arnman K; Rydén L
Eur Heart J; 1983 Sep; 4(9):668-73. PubMed ID: 6641759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A double-blind study of submaximal exercise tolerance and variation in paced rate in atrial synchronous compared to activity sensor modulated ventricular pacing.
Linde-Edelstam C; Nordlander R; Pehrsson SK; Rydén L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jun; 15(6):905-15. PubMed ID: 1376903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: is it worth it?
Sulke N; Tan K; Kamalvand K; Bostock J; Bucknall C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1560-7. PubMed ID: 8946451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of ventricular function on the exercise hemodynamics of variable rate pacing.
Buckingham TA; Woodruff RC; Pennington DG; Redd RM; Janosik DL; Labovitz AJ; Graves R; Kennedy HL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Jun; 11(6):1269-77. PubMed ID: 3367001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sustained improvement in exercise tolerance following physiological cardiac pacing.
Sutton R; Perrins EJ; Morley C; Chan SL
Eur Heart J; 1983 Nov; 4(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 6653589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of single lead VDD pacing in patients with impaired and normal left ventricular function.
Schuchert A; Jakob M; Treese N; Schöpfel A; Schmidt W; Jung W; Kreuzer J; Staedt U; Stertmann WA; Meinertz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Aug; 23(8):1263-7. PubMed ID: 10962749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomised crossover trial of rate responsive Activitrax and conventional fixed rate ventricular pacing.
Lipkin DP; Buller N; Frenneaux M; Ludgate L; Lowe T; Webb SC; Krikler DM
Br Heart J; 1987 Dec; 58(6):613-6. PubMed ID: 3322351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physiologic VDD versus nonphysiologic VVI pacing in canine 3rd-degree atrioventricular block.
Bulmer BJ; Sisson DD; Oyama MA; Solter PF; Grimm KA; Lamont L
J Vet Intern Med; 2006; 20(2):257-71. PubMed ID: 16594581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate and mid-term safety and efficacy of single lead VDD pacemakers for patients with atrioventricular block and normal sinus node function--a single centre experience.
Tan JL; Hsu LF; Kam RM; Teo WS
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2003 Jan; 32(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 12625106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
