These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6200129)

  • 1. Contrast media for left ventricular angiography. A comparison between Cardio-Conray and iopamidol.
    Gwilt DJ; Nagle RE
    Br Heart J; 1984 Apr; 51(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 6200129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iopamidol compared with Conray in peripheral angiography.
    Wojciechowski J; Johansson R; Björk L
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1982; 23(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 6763456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast agent induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: iopamidol versus meglumine iothalamate.
    Lea Thomas M; Keeling FP; Piaggio RB; Treweeke PS
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Mar; 57(675):205-7. PubMed ID: 6365232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.
    Bird CR; Drayer BP; Velaj R; Triolo PJ; Allen S; Bates M; Yeates AE; Heinz ER; Osborne DR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1984; 5(6):801-3. PubMed ID: 6437183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical cardiovascular experiences with iopamidol: a new non-ionic contrast medium.
    Partridge JB; Robinson PJ; Turnbull CM; Stoker JB; Boyle RM; Morrison GW
    Clin Radiol; 1981 Jul; 32(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 6972848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iopamidol and Conray 60: comparison in superselective angiography.
    Schonfeld SM; Pinto RS; Schonfeld AR; Berenstein A; Manuell M; Kricheff II
    Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):809-11. PubMed ID: 6379748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absence of myocardial biochemical toxicity with a nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol).
    Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Neese RA; Morris DL
    Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):609-17. PubMed ID: 4036786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: a randomized double-blind study.
    Salem DN; Konstam MA; Isner JM; Bonin JD
    Am Heart J; 1986 Mar; 111(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 3006464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary angiography with Iopamidol.
    Selin K; Wallin J; Björk L
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1982; 23(6):545-8. PubMed ID: 6763455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of tri-iodoisophthaldiamide with meglumine lothalamate in phlebography of the leg.
    Thomas ML; Briggs GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Apr; 138(4):725-7. PubMed ID: 7039276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Hexabrix 320 and Conray 420 for left ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Lyons J; Brooks N; Cattell M; Isolani-Smyth E; Balcon R
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Mar; 57(675):209-11. PubMed ID: 6365233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in left ventricular diastolic function after left ventriculography: a comparison with iopamidol and urografin.
    Tani M; Handa S; Noma S; Kojima S; Miyamori R; Miyazaki T; Yoshino H; Ohnishi S; Yamazaki H; Nakamura Y
    Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 4036787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Hemodynamic response to opacification of the left ventricle. Comparative study of 3 contrast media with different structures].
    Petitier H; Crochet D; Bizais Y; de Laguerenne J; Grossetête R; Delumeau J
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):753-7. PubMed ID: 6670836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of platelet function by contrast media: iopamidol and ioxaglate versus iothalamate. Work in progress.
    Rao AK; Rao VM; Willis J; Beckett C; Steiner RM
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 4011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are ioxaglate and iopamidol equally safe and well tolerated in cardiac angiography? A randomized, double-blind clinical study.
    Piscione F; Focaccio A; Santinelli V; De Paola M; Villari B; Spinazzi A; Condorelli M; Chiariello M
    Am Heart J; 1990 Nov; 120(5):1130-6. PubMed ID: 2239665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the sickling phenomenon.
    Rao VM; Rao AK; Steiner RM; Burka ER; Grainger RG; Ballas SK
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 7089282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative trial of sodium meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) and iopamidol (Niopam) for cerebral angiography.
    Molyneux AJ; Sheldon PW; Yates DA
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec; 55(660):881-4. PubMed ID: 6756533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative effects on left ventricular function in coronary patients of various contrast media used in coronarography: iopamidol, diatrizoate, ioxaglate].
    Crochet D; Petitier H; de Laguerenne J; Wanlin P; Bourdon A; Grossetête R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):758-63. PubMed ID: 6670837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Iopamidol and meglumine diatrizoate: comparison of effects on patient discomfort during aortofemoral arteriography.
    Widrich WC; Beckman CF; Robbins AH; Scholz FJ; Srinivasan MK; Hayes EJ; Kellum CD; Newman T
    Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 6344138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.