These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6201344)

  • 1. Effects of high-pass filter frequency and slope on BAEP amplitude, latency and wave form.
    Elton M; Scherg M; Von Cramon D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 May; 57(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 6201344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT; Franks R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential in the rat.
    Shaw NA
    Exp Brain Res; 1987; 65(3):686-90. PubMed ID: 3556497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Apr; 51(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 6164544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The brainstem auditory evoked potential: effects of high frequency filtering.
    Shaw NA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 2351091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of analog filtering on brain stem auditory-evoked potentials in dogs.
    Kawasaki Y; Inada S
    Am J Vet Res; 1992 Jul; 53(7):1096-100. PubMed ID: 1497176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital filtering and spectral analysis of the low intensity ABR.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD; Franks R; Han JC
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3342945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High pass digital and analog filtering of the middle latency response.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD
    Ear Hear; 1987 Apr; 8(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 3582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency specificity of simultaneously recorded early and middle latency auditory evoked potentials.
    Scherg M; Volk SA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Nov; 56(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 6194961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of digital filtering and automatic peak detection to brain stem auditory evoked potential.
    Fridman J; John ER; Bergelson M; Kaiser JB; Baird HW
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 6175502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rate and filter effects on the developing middle-latency response.
    Kraus N; Smith DI; McGee T
    Audiology; 1987; 26(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 3675310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of noise masking on the brain-stem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: central and peripheral components.
    Gott PS; Hughes EC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 74(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 2465888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: a comparison of two high-frequency filter settings.
    Cacace AT; Shy M; Satya-Murti S
    Neurology; 1980 Jul; 30(7 Pt 1):765-7. PubMed ID: 7190242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain stem auditory-evoked potentials of dogs: wave forms and effects of recording electrode positions.
    Holliday TA; Te Selle ME
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Apr; 46(4):845-51. PubMed ID: 4014834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Ainslie PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6153356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unrecognized errors due to analog filtering of the brain-stem auditory evoked response.
    Janssen R; Benignus VA; Grimes LM; Dyer RS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 2420573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The human fetal auditory evoked potential.
    Staley K; Iragui V; Spitz M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1688780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus repetition rate on slow and fast components of auditory brain-stem responses.
    Suzuki T; Kobayashi K; Takagi N
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Mar; 65(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 2419104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.