These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6202487)

  • 1. The influence of click phase and rate upon latencies and latency distributions of the normal brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Sand T; Sulg I
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Jun; 57(6):561-70. PubMed ID: 6202487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BAEP subcomponents and wave form--relation to click phase and stimulus rate.
    Sand T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Jan; 65(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2416548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Click polarity inversion effects upon the human brainstem auditory evoked potential.
    Kevanishvili Z; Aphonchenko V
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 7302521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of phase of stimulus and the reference recording electrode in brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Hughes JR; Fino J; Gagnon L
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Jun; 51(6):611-23. PubMed ID: 6165562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between auditory brain stem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks.
    Tietze G; Pantev C
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 3954683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in the rat: effects of gender, stimulus characteristics and ethanol sedation.
    Church MW; Williams HL; Holloway JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Jul; 59(4):328-39. PubMed ID: 6203722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The interaction between sex and click polarity in brain-stem auditory potentials evoked from control subjects of Oriental and Caucasian origin.
    Chan YW; Woo EK; Hammond SR; Yiannikas C; McLeod JG
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 2446849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The influence of click polarity and stimulation rate on the auditory evoked response in relation to age].
    Tarantino V; Stura M; Raspino M; Conrad E; Porcu A
    Pediatr Med Chir; 1989; 11(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 2631058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response.
    Beattie RC
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 3187380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined effect of click rate and stimulus polarity on BAEP latencies.
    Cassvan A; Ralescu S; Shames J; Medina E
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 29(7-8):453-8. PubMed ID: 2606072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials evoked by clicks of different polarity in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Tackmann W; Vogel P
    Eur Neurol; 1987; 26(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 3595656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).
    Pineda JA; Holmes TC; Swick D; Foote SL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989 Dec; 73(6):532-43. PubMed ID: 2480887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of click polarity on the brain-stem auditory evoked response (BAER) revisited.
    Schwartz DM; Morris MD; Spydell JD; Ten Brink C; Grim MA; Schwartz JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(6):445-57. PubMed ID: 1701707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further differences between brain-stem auditory potentials evoked by rarefaction and condensation clicks as revealed by vector analysis.
    Coutin P; Balmaseda A; Miranda J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 66(4):420-6. PubMed ID: 2435522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus repetition rate on the auditory brain stem responses (ABR).
    Paludetti G; Maurizi M; Ottaviani F
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jan; 4(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 6829737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear potentials and auditory evoked potentials in the caiman (Caiman crocodilus (L.)).
    Smolders JW; Caird DM; Klinke R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Feb; 75(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 1688779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. I. The variability of the normal response.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Lindström B; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 756085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of stimulus polarity on far-field auditory-evoked electrical responses in the chick.
    Brown-Borg HM; Beck MM; Jones TA
    J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 3436924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The choice of ABR click polarity and amplitude variables in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Sand T
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 1842273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.