These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6203670)

  • 1. The effects of listening conditions on speech rating obtained in a clinical setting.
    Moller KT; Starr CD
    Cleft Palate J; 1984 Apr; 21(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 6203670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of examiner expectancy on speech ratings of individuals with cleft lip and/or palate.
    Ramig LA
    Cleft Palate J; 1982 Oct; 19(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 6959745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of speech intelligibility for children with cleft lip and palate by means of automatic speech recognition.
    Schuster M; Maier A; Haderlein T; Nkenke E; Wohlleben U; Rosanowski F; Eysholdt U; Nöth E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Oct; 70(10):1741-7. PubMed ID: 16814875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech ratings by speech clinicians, parents and children.
    Starr CD; Moller KT; Dawson W; Graham J; Skaar S
    Cleft Palate J; 1984 Oct; 21(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 6595084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cleft audit protocol for speech-augmented: A validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech.
    John A; Sell D; Sweeney T; Harding-Bell A; Williams A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 May; 43(3):272-88. PubMed ID: 16681400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of listening conditions and listener characteristics on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Pennington L; Miller N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 May; 21(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 17468997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech results of cleft palate surgery: two methods of assessment.
    Bagnall AD; David DJ
    Br J Plast Surg; 1988 Sep; 41(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 3179594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptions of audible nasal emission in speakers with cleft palate: a comparative study of listener judgments.
    Baylis AL; Munson B; Moller KT
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 20572776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of breathy voice source on ratings of hypernasality.
    Imatomi S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Nov; 42(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 16241176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the progress of therapy in patients with cleft lip, jaw and palate, using voice analysis--a pilot study.
    Gugsch C; Dannhauer KH; Fuchs M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jul; 69(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 18797830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study of relationships between judgments of speech and appearance of patients with orofacial clefts.
    Glass L; Starr CD
    Cleft Palate J; 1979 Oct; 16(4):436-40. PubMed ID: 290434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality.
    Whitehill TL; Lee AS; Chun JC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 14748640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech outcome regarding overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance and voice in Flemish children a year after pharyngeal flap surgery. A pilot study.
    Van Lierde KM; Bonte K; Baudonck N; Van Cauwenberge P; De Leenheer EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 18698142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observed effects of velopharyngeal orifice size on vowel identification and vowel nasality.
    Watterson T; Emanuel F
    Cleft Palate J; 1981 Oct; 18(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 6945158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of speech disorders in children with cleft lip and palate.
    Paal S; Reulbach U; Strobel-Schwarthoff K; Nkenke E; Schuster M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Jul; 66(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 16044225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech and language development in toddlers with and without cleft palate.
    Priester GH; Goorhuis-Brouwer SM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 72(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 18384888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of narrow phonetic transcription for highly unintelligible speech: some examples.
    Ball M; Müller N; Klopfenstein M; Rutter B
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2009; 34(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 19449253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical and speech results following palatopharyngoplasty operations in Denmark 1959-1977.
    Brøndsted K; Liisberg WB; Orsted A; Prytz S; Fogh-Andersen P
    Cleft Palate J; 1984 Jul; 21(3):170-9. PubMed ID: 6592059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transforming assessment of speech in children with cleft palate via online crowdsourcing.
    Sescleifer AM; Francoisse CA; Webber JC; Rector JD; Lin AY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227686. PubMed ID: 31917818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.