149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6204283)
1. Rate hysteresis pacing: how valuable is it? A comparison of the stimulation rates of 70 and 50 beats per minute and rate hysteresis in patients with sinus node disease.
Rosenqvist M; Vallin HO; Edhag KO
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 May; 7(3 Pt 1):332-40. PubMed ID: 6204283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode.
Nitardy A; Langreck H; Dietz R; Stockburger M
Clin Res Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 98(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18853096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Respiratory-dependent atrial pacing, management of sinus node disease.
Rognoni G; Bolognese L; Aina F; Occhetta E; Magnani A; Rossi P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1853-9. PubMed ID: 2463558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atrial vs. dual-chamber cardiac pacing in sinus node disease: a register-based cohort study.
Fored CM; Granath F; Gadler F; Blomqvist P; Rynder J; Linde C; Ekbom A; Rosenqvist M
Europace; 2008 Jul; 10(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 18467299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effects of overdrive on sinus and subsidiary pacemaker function.
Jordan J; Yamaguchi I; Mandel WJ; McCullen AE
Am Heart J; 1977 Mar; 93(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 65911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing the stimulation rate in patients with intermittent bradycardia and a single lead pacemaker.
Rosenqvist M; Edhag OK; Lagergren H; Nordlander R; Vallin H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4 Pt 1):702-7. PubMed ID: 7683795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diurnal changes and reproducibility of corrected sinus node recovery time.
Thormann J; Schlepper M; Kramer W
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1983; 9(5):439-51. PubMed ID: 6685574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of sinus node disease in patients with AV block: implications for single lead VDD pacing.
Wiegand UK; Bode F; Schneider R; Brandes A; Haase H; Katus HA; Potratz J
Heart; 1999 Jun; 81(6):580-5. PubMed ID: 10336914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic ventricular overdrive stimulation in atrial fibrillation: effects on ventricular rate irregularity, ventricular pacing, and fusion beats.
Nölker G; Gutleben KJ; Asbach S; Ritscher G; Marschang H; Sinha AM; Boileau P; Benser ME; Hallier B; Hümmer A; Brachmann J
Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1688-94. PubMed ID: 21784744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intermittent pacemaker syndrome: revision of VVI pacemaker to a new cardiac pacing mode for tachy-brady syndrome.
McCormick DJ; Shuck JW; Ansinelli RA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Mar; 10(2):372-7. PubMed ID: 2437541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Atrial stimulation and intranodal migration of sinus pacemaker in man (author's transl)].
Masini G; Zanetti L; Dianda R
G Ital Cardiol; 1981; 11(9):1198-210. PubMed ID: 6173282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atrioventricular conduction disturbances in patients with sinoatrial node disease and atrial pacing.
Swiatecka G; Sielski S; Wilczek R; Jackowiak D; Kubica J; Raczak G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2074-6. PubMed ID: 1279602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block.
Mayumi H; Kohno H; Yasui H; Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing ventricular pacing in sinus node dysfunction.
Ishikawa T; Sumita S; Kosuge M; Giese C; Markowitz T; Tsunoda S; Uchino K; Kobayashi T; Matsushita K; Inoue N; Matsushita K; Taima M; Kimura K; Umemura S
Int Heart J; 2007 May; 48(3):323-36. PubMed ID: 17592197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morbidity and mortality of patients with sinus node disease: comparative effects of atrial and ventricular pacing.
Zanini R; Facchinetti AI; Gallo G; Cazzamalli L; Bonandi L; Dei Cas L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2076-9. PubMed ID: 1704596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical observations with long-term atrial pacing.
Böhm A; Pintér A; Székely A; Préda I
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):246-9. PubMed ID: 9474681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of intrinsic versus paced ventricular function.
Jutzy RV; Feenstra L; Pai R; Florio J; Bansal R; Aybar R; Levine PA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1919-22. PubMed ID: 1279572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sinus node function after cardiac transplantation.
Scott CD; Dark JH; McComb JM
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 24(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 7930258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
