BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6205530)

  • 1. Tumor marker studies of cervical smears. Potential for automation.
    Moncrieff D; Ormerod MG; Coleman DV
    Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(4):407-10. PubMed ID: 6205530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immunocytochemical staining of cervical smears for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Moncrieff D; Ormerod MG; Coleman DV
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1984 Sep; 6(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 6391321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An immunohistochemical study of the distribution of epithelial antigens in the uterine cervix.
    Bamford PN; Ormerod MG; Sloane JP; Warburton MJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 May; 61(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 6188081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tumor marker studies of cervical smears: an immunohistochemical approach.
    Sarker AB; Koirala TR; Nose S; Jeon HJ; Hoshida Y
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1994 Jan; 37(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 7522221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards an automated procedure for the quantitative cytological screening of cervical neoplasms.
    Sincock AM; Middleton J; Moncrieff D
    J Clin Pathol; 1983 May; 36(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 6841647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated screening of cervical smears using immunocytochemical staining: a possible approach.
    Valkova B; Laurence DJ
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Aug; 38(8):886-92. PubMed ID: 2411765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [An immunohistochemical study of the distribution of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) in uterine carcinoma].
    Fukuda K; Fujimoto I; Masubuchi K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 May; 39(5):739-45. PubMed ID: 3598270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epithelial membrane antigen in cells from the uterine cervix: immunocytochemical staining of cervical smears.
    Valkova B; Ormerod MG; Moncrieff D; Coleman DV
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Sep; 37(9):984-9. PubMed ID: 6206101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance in cervical cytologic smears.
    Korn AP; Judson PL; Zaloudek CJ
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Sep; 43(9):774-8. PubMed ID: 9777615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical and vaginal cytologic smears suggestive of adenocarcinoma.
    Pretorius R; Binstock M; Sadeghi M; Hodges W
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8829059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fluorescent studies directed towards the location of abnormal epithelial cells in cervical smears.
    Steven FS; Johnson J
    Cytopathology; 1990; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 1714306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The significance of endocervical cells in the vaginal smear and a new technic for the collection of endocervical smears].
    Boon ME; Alons van Kordelaar JJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Mar; 130(12):557. PubMed ID: 3960172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
    Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Less pap-2 results ('minor abnormalities') in the population screening for cervical cancer since the introduction of new guidelines in 1996].
    Bos AB; van Ballegooijen M; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Habbema JD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(34):1586-90. PubMed ID: 12224483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
    Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of skull base chordomas.
    Kubota T; Sato K; Kabuto M; Kawano H; Nakagawa T; Arai Y; Tachibana O; Yoshida K; Yamashita J
    Noshuyo Byori; 1994; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 7512866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic marker displays for intermediate cells from the uterine cervix.
    Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Dytch HE; Pishotta FT; Yamauchi K; Wied GL
    Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 6950623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
    Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of cervical neoplasia.
    Fray RE; Husain OA; To AC; Watts KC; Lader S; Rogers GT; Taylor-Papadimitriou J; Morris NF
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Oct; 91(10):1037-41. PubMed ID: 6386038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.