These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6206470)

  • 1. Mechanism for testing operant conditioning and body rocking in developmental disabilities.
    Aman MG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Jun; 58(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 6206470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of rocking behavior.
    Hollis JH
    Monogr Am Assoc Ment Defic; 1978; (3):1-53. PubMed ID: 750911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.
    DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Conners J; Wallace MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 10201108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a comprehensive model of stereotypy: integrating operant and neurobiological interpretations.
    Lanovaz MJ
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):447-55. PubMed ID: 21236636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An experimental analysis of aggression.
    Marcus BA; Vollmer TR; Swanson V; Roane HR; Ringdahl JE
    Behav Modif; 2001 Apr; 25(2):189-213. PubMed ID: 11317634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental control of rhythm in stereotyped body rocking.
    Pohl P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Oct; 42(43):483-6. PubMed ID: 980643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Steady and transition states: effects of alternative activity on body-rocking in retarded children.
    Hollis JH
    Psychol Rep; 1976 Aug; 39(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 959462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of brief and extended stimulus availability on preference.
    Steinhilber J; Johnson C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(4):767-72. PubMed ID: 18189114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of stimulus control over a communication response as an intervention for stereotypical responding.
    Anderson CM; Doughty SS; Doughty AH; Williams DC; Saunders KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(2):333-9. PubMed ID: 21119910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.
    Kodak T; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Kisamore A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 19327964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body-rocking: effects of sound and reinforcement.
    Hollis JH
    Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Mar; 75(5):642-4. PubMed ID: 5551511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-injurious behavior and sequential analysis: context matters.
    Symons FJ
    Am J Ment Retard; 2005 Jul; 110(4):323-6; discussion 326-9. PubMed ID: 15941368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items.
    McAdam DB; Klatt KP; Koffarnus M; Dicesare A; Solberg K; Welch C; Murphy S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 15898479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical solution of the problem of investigation of instrumental conditioned reflexes with intragastric reinforcement.
    Zajac M
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1973; 24(3):485-9. PubMed ID: 4197226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of motivating operations and discriminative stimuli on challenging behavior maintained by positive reinforcement.
    Edrisinha C; O'Reilly M; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Choi HY
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):836-45. PubMed ID: 21095097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application of operant conditioning techniques to forensic toxicology: experimental studies on alcohol and abusable drugs].
    Hishida S
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Oct; 50(5):292-319. PubMed ID: 8952330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the relation between reinforcer efficacy and preference.
    Lee MS; Yu CT; Martin TL; Martin GL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010 Mar; 43(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 20808498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.
    Fleming CV; Wheeler GM; Cannella-Malone HI; Basbagill AR; Chung YC; Day KG
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2010; 13(4):266-75. PubMed ID: 20629593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Group behavior of rats under schedules of reinforcement.
    Grott R; Neuringer A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Sep; 22(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 4413600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.