These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 621134)

  • 41. Immunological aspects of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis.
    Eiferman RA; Wilkins EL
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1979 Apr; 14(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 378334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Impression cytology and its light and electron microscopy equivalent in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca].
    Koch JM; Waubke TN
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1987; 84(5):446-9. PubMed ID: 3428813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Tear cytokine profiling in patients with superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis who underwent medical treatment or in conjunction with surgical management.
    Sun YC; Tang YH; Liou HM; Chen WL; Hu FR
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 104(5):735-740. PubMed ID: 30926588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Use of pressure patching and soft contact lenses in superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis.
    Mondino BJ; Zaidman GW; Salamon SW
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1982 Dec; 100(12):1932-4. PubMed ID: 7150059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Studies on the progestational endometrium of the rabbit. II. Electron microscopy, day 0 to day 13 of gonadotrophin-induced pseudopregnancy.
    Davies J; Hoffman LH
    Am J Anat; 1975 Mar; 142(3):335-65. PubMed ID: 1168017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Topical steroids to the superior bulbar conjunctiva for the treatment of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis (SLK).
    Kiser KA; Hong AR; Lubniewski A; Huang AJW; Margolis TP
    Ocul Surf; 2022 Jan; 23():114-115. PubMed ID: 34883275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Nucleus and cell size changes in human bulbar conjunctival cells after soft contact lens wear, as assessed by impression cytology.
    Doughty MJ; Naase T
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Jun; 31(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 18258477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. In vivo corneal and conjunctival epithelial nuclear stain.
    Wander AH; Neumeister RD; Tschismadia I; Choromokos EA; Masukawa T
    Cornea; 1985-1986; 4(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 2419030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis in identical twins.
    Darrell RW
    Cornea; 1992 May; 11(3):262-3. PubMed ID: 1587136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis. Clinical and pathological correlations.
    Theodore FH; Ferry AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1970 Oct; 84(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 5492455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Presence of bar-shaped nuclear chromatin in cell samples from the conjunctiva.
    Kobayashi TK; Tsubota K; Ugajin Y; Hasegawa T
    Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 1543000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Electron microscopic examinations of a conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma before and during beta-irradiation.
    Klug H; Lommatzsch P
    Invest Ophthalmol; 1975 Oct; 14(10):791-6. PubMed ID: 1184313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. New surgical approach for superior conjunctivochalasis.
    Kheirkhah A; Casas V; Esquenazi S; Blanco G; Li W; Raju VK; Tseng SC
    Cornea; 2007 Jul; 26(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17592317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Induction of conjunctival epithelial alterations by contact lens wearing. A prospective study.
    Knop E; Brewitt H
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1992; 1(3-4):125-34. PubMed ID: 1483123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Karyometric characteristics of the accessory apparatus of the eye in embryonal histogenesis].
    Brusilovskiĭ AI; Shapovalova EIu
    Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol; 1989 Jul; 97(7):32-9. PubMed ID: 2818218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cartography of impression cytology.
    Grene RB; Lankston P
    Cornea; 1990 Oct; 9(4):275-8. PubMed ID: 2078955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bar-shaped nuclear chromatin in conjunctival samples: with cytologic features and ultrastructural correlation.
    Kobayashi TK; Ishida Y; Kaneko C; Tsubota K
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(5):1129-32. PubMed ID: 9755669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Conjunctival impression cytology in patients wearing contact lenses.
    Adar S; Kanpolat A; Sürücü S; Ucakhan OO
    Cornea; 1997 May; 16(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 9143800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of grading schemes to quantitative assessments of nucleus-to-cytoplasmic ratios for human bulbar conjunctival cells collected by impression cytology.
    Blades KJ; Doughty MJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Apr; 20(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 10806448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Surgical approach with high-frequency radiowave electrosurgery for superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis.
    Ahn JM; Choi CY; Seo KY
    Cornea; 2014 Feb; 33(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24322803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.