These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
13. [Experimental study of a composite: Miradapt J. & J]. Mincione E; Forabosco A Riv Odontostomatol Implantoprotesi; 1982; (6):15-9. PubMed ID: 6221212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins. Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microporosity in bis-glycidyl methacrylate films. Williams B; von Fraunhofer JA J Oral Rehabil; 1980 May; 7(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 6447201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Interface between composite resins for posterior teeth and tooth substances with particular reference to lining materials and liners]. Kinoshita K; Arai K Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1985; 14(1):51-79. PubMed ID: 3910149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) microfilled composite bonded weakly to BIS-GMA composite, therefore their combined use should be avoided. Rueggerberg FA J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):117. PubMed ID: 2521668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Class 2 composite restorations: prevention in vitro of contraction gaps. Jørgensen KD; Hisamitsu H J Dent Res; 1984 Feb; 63(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 6229556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical comparison of three tooth-colored restorative resins. Davis RD; Mayhew RB; Voss JE J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1982; 61(5):9-12. PubMed ID: 6219164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength in three dentinal bonding systems. Fanning DE; Wakefield CW; Robbins JW; Bagley AL Gen Dent; 1995; 43(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 8940582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]