These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6212630)

  • 1. Order information in multiple-element comparison.
    Angiolillo-Bent JS; Rips LJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Jun; 8(3):392-406. PubMed ID: 6212630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Same-different judgments of multiletter strings: insensitivity to positional bias and spacing.
    Proctor RW; Healy AF; Van Zandt T
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jan; 49(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 2011454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra- and interpattern relations in letter recognition.
    Sanocki T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):924-41. PubMed ID: 1837304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tilted letters and tilted words: a possible role for principal axes in visual word recognition.
    Driver J; Baylis GC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):560-8. PubMed ID: 7476242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of familiarity of Multielement matching.
    Regan JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Dec; 7(6):1273-82. PubMed ID: 6458651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings.
    Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 528895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of category identity on letter matching: conceptual penetration of visual processing or response competition?
    Chen J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):716-29. PubMed ID: 22231606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task.
    Rueckl JG; Suzuki S; Yeh SL
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 May; 49(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 2057307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irrelevant differences in the "same"--"different" task.
    Miller J; Bauer DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Feb; 7(1):196-207. PubMed ID: 6452496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of irrelevant differences as a function of the relations between relevant and irrelevant dimensions in the same-different task.
    Watanabe T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Feb; 14(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 2964502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responses of hippocampal formation neurons in the monkey related to delayed spatial response and object-place memory tasks.
    Cahusac PM; Miyashita Y; Rolls ET
    Behav Brain Res; 1989 Jul; 33(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 2757782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facilitation in letter detection with sequentially presented homophonic strings.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1986 Jan; 113(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 3701306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition time for letters and nonletters: effects of serial position, array size, and processing order.
    Mason M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):724-38. PubMed ID: 6218232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of item distinctiveness in short-term recall of order information.
    Cunningham TF; Marmie WR; Healy AF
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):463-76. PubMed ID: 9610118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.
    Ambler BA; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 830185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interference of concomitant tasks on simple reaction time: attentional and motor factors.
    Rizzolatti G; Bertoloni G; De Bastiani PL
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 7133382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes.
    Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 May; 16(2):351-64. PubMed ID: 2142204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual grouping in visual word recognition.
    Bock JM; Monk AF; Hulme C
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 8433651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.