These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6212784)

  • 1. Court decisions and the feds: travesty or tragedy?
    Curtin LL
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 6212784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supreme Court asked to review application of Rehabilitation Act to medical decisions.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 2931399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An introduction to the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc.
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2931397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handicapped babies: a right to life?
    Kuhse H; Singer P
    Nurs Mirror; 1985 Feb; 160(8):17-20. PubMed ID: 3156312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Baby Doe rules.
    Angell M
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Mar; 314(10):642-4. PubMed ID: 2935736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The civil rights of handicapped infants: an Oklahoma "experiment".
    Gerry MH
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):15-66. PubMed ID: 2931398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments.
    Crossley M
    Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Babies Doe: common sense and common decency.
    Curtin LL
    Nurs Manage; 1983 Dec; 14(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 6228749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Baby Doe controversy.
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Sep; 315(11):707-8. PubMed ID: 3748076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legally speaking. Infanticide: when doctor's orders read "murder".
    Horan DJ
    RN; 1982 Jan; 45(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 6915615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Right to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
    Gustaitis R
    Pediatrics; 1988 Feb; 81(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 3340483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
    Fost N
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 2969769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life-support systems: parents and dying children.
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Nov; 24(6):1. PubMed ID: 6557593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal issues in neonatal intensive care.
    Zajac BM
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1989; 34(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 10304002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. View from the Nation's Courts.
    Freishtat HW
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1986 Oct; 6(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 2945836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protection of disabled newborns: are there constitutional limitations?
    Bopp J
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):173-200. PubMed ID: 2933364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical futility: when is enough, enough?
    Cultice PN
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Aug; 27(8):225-32, 256. PubMed ID: 10171943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts.
    Steinbock B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6232243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dilemma of wrongful birth, wrongful life. Interview by Bill trent.
    Dickens BM
    CMAJ; 1985 Dec; 133(12):1238-40. PubMed ID: 2933137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.