These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [On the problem of reviewing medical information]. Rieger HJ Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1968 Sep; 93(38):1823-5. PubMed ID: 5673254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Liability by the physician from simple testimonies and certificates]. Roesch H Med Klin; 1979 Sep; 74(37):1332-8. PubMed ID: 492056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Expert testimony problems in the area of gastroenterology]. Dölle W Landarzt; 1968 May; 44(13):652-6. PubMed ID: 5716448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Disfigurations. Medical and legal aspects of expert opinion]. Möllhoff G Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1982; 40():351-74. PubMed ID: 7165659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Final remark on the topic "the same disease"]. Hartwig H Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1974 May; 36(5):359-61. PubMed ID: 4275726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The opinion of a contract physician. Comments on Lekon's article in Off. Gesundh.-Wesen 36 (1974) 87]. Kirschbaum G Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1974 Sep; 36(9):700-1. PubMed ID: 4278399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Inspection of medical records and testimonies by patients]. Rieger HJ Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Apr; 104(16):570-1. PubMed ID: 436631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Expert testimony problems in inflammatory and degenerative articular diseases]. Franke M Landarzt; 1968 May; 44(13):656-60. PubMed ID: 5304904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Need for knowledge of laws to establish a useful expert testimony]. Stern U Med Klin; 1972 Apr; 67(14):505-11. PubMed ID: 5042083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [The defendant physician in a fatal case of local anesthesia administration]. Köln UR Anasthesiol Intensivmed Prax; 1975; 10(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 1163753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Participation of pre-existing conditions in disability classification. Problem of higher classification]. Erdmann H Hefte Unfallheilkd; 1975; (121):281-2. PubMed ID: 1193974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Refusal of medical expert. A critical observation]. Stern M Munch Med Wochenschr; 1969 Mar; 111(12):673-7. PubMed ID: 5819272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The significance of simulation tests in ophthalmological expert opinions]. Weder W Buch Augenarzt; 1978; 73():47-50. PubMed ID: 569001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Possibilities and limits of the contract physician in appraising the occupational disability to assure the success of the healing process (Article 369b, para. 2 of the Imperial Insurance Law (RVO)]. Sieckel L Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1971 Jun; 33(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 4253617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Expert testimony according to the law on the severely disabled]. Brusis T; Seiferth LB HNO; 1982 Nov; 30(11):397-403. PubMed ID: 6219078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Copyright concerning significance of the note "Is not to be used for other purposes" on expert testimonies]. Ost W Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1976 Oct; 101(41):1504-6. PubMed ID: 964154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Current decisions in social insurance (5)]. Grundner-Culemann AW Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1983 Oct; 45(10):540-3. PubMed ID: 6227852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [On assessment of heart diseases following dystrophy]. Spatz R Munch Med Wochenschr; 1967 Apr; 109(14):798-801. PubMed ID: 5631415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]