These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6214443)

  • 21. Evaluation of text telephones designed for people with impaired hearing or speech.
    Spicer J; Schmidt R; Ward CD; Pinnington LL
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 16019883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Practical hearing compensation and an assessment of hearing effect in patients with profound hearing loss using hearing aids].
    Kawano A
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1993 Mar; 96(3):466-77. PubMed ID: 8473958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An analysis of the health care needs of the hearing impaired: from hearing aids to microcomputers.
    Grove SJ; Fisk RP
    J Health Care Mark; 1983; 3(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10313676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application and usage of tactile aid in Iran.
    Karimi-Yazdi A; Sazgar AA; Nadimi-Tehran A; Faramarzi A; Nassaj FE; Yahyavi S
    Arch Iran Med; 2006 Oct; 9(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 17061607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The speech spectrographic display: interpretation of visual patterns by hearing-impaired adults.
    Maki JE; Gustafson MS; Conklin JM; Humphrey-Whitehead BK
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Nov; 46(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 6457933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wireless telephones and hearing aids: an overview.
    Ross M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):286-9. PubMed ID: 11440314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Pocket Speech Aid.
    Keating D; Smith DC; Evans AL; Wyper DJ; Cunningham E
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1989 May; 27(3):288-90. PubMed ID: 2532280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating tactile aids for speech perception and production by hearing-impaired adults and children.
    Weisenberger JM; Kozma-Spytek L
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():188-200. PubMed ID: 2069181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of the magnitude estimation technique for assessing the performance of text-to-speech synthesis systems.
    Pavlovic CV; Rossi M; Espesser R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jan; 87(1):373-82. PubMed ID: 2137144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relation between aided synthetic sentence identification scores and hearing aid user satisfaction.
    Hayes D; Jerger J; Taff J; Barber B
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 6222932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of word speed, number of words, and habituation on the discrimination score of synthesized speech.
    Rahko T; Karjalainen M; Laine U; Lavonen A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1980; 89(1 Pt 1):69-71. PubMed ID: 6444503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population.
    Kepler LJ; Terry M; Sweetman RH
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):311-9. PubMed ID: 1487091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A short report from the project "Improved communication aids for people with speech impediments".
    Björck-Akesson E; Hjort I; Lagerman U; Lekemo U; Olow I; Zackrisson G
    Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1983; 9():9-14. PubMed ID: 6232701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Field measurements of electromagnetic interference in hearing aids.
    Levitt H; Harkins J; Singer B; Yeung E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):275-80. PubMed ID: 11440312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tactual speech perception by minimally trained deaf subjects.
    Oller DK; Payne SL; Gavin WJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):769-78. PubMed ID: 6449633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multisensory speech perception by profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Cobo-Lewis A
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1989 Feb; 54(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 2521682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of telephone amplifying devices by the hearing-impaired.
    Pichora-Fuller MK
    J Otolaryngol; 1981 Jun; 10(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 7277561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Telephone listening ability for hearing-impaired individuals.
    Holmes AE; Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 6724177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.