These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6215799)

  • 1. [Breakage tests and surface smoothness of working models after spraying the impressions with spray material].
    Ludwig K; Korber KH; Huber K
    Zahntechnik (Zur); 1982; 40(3):221-8, 230-5. PubMed ID: 6215799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Studies on the dimensional accuracy of complete dental arch casts, especially on the effects of various methods of taking impressions ((author's transl)].
    Shigeto N
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1981 Dec; 13(2):197-216. PubMed ID: 7045201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reproduction of the abutment clearance in casting fixed tooth replacements].
    Lehmann KM; Lindemann J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 May; 35(5):537-9. PubMed ID: 7004843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Methods for the immediate casting of impressions intended for making working models with removable props].
    Kissov H; Hadziev R; Hadzigaev J
    Stomatologiia (Sofiia); 1983; 65(5):69-72. PubMed ID: 6388047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro study of transmission of bacteria from contaminated metal models to stone models via impressions.
    Sofou A; Larsen T; Owall B; Fiehn NE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 12271350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selecting materials for the fabrication of dies (III).
    Ullo CA; Whist R
    Quintessence Dent Technol; 1984; 8(7):445-8. PubMed ID: 6387809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictable elastomeric impressions in advanced fixed prosthodontics: a comprehensive review.
    Lee EA
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):529-36; quiz 537, 565. PubMed ID: 18038717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study of bridges cast in one piece by the traditional method or by using duplicate models].
    Chmielewski W; Karski Z; Wajs S
    Protet Stomatol; 1979; 29(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 399355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
    Briley TF
    Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The three-dimensional casting distortion of five implant-supported frameworks.
    Mitha T; Owen CP; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 19548406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reproduction precision of surface profiles of metal casts].
    Hikl W; Meiners H; Vahl J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1973 Sep; 28(9):926-34. PubMed ID: 4586729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Casting technique for gold alloys (2)].
    Lutzmann M; Wall G
    Quintessenz Zahntech; 1990 Sep; 16(9):1099-107. PubMed ID: 2098838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptation of finger-smoothed irreversible hydrocolloid to impression surfaces.
    Lim PF; Neo KH; Sitoh L; Yeo KL; Stokes A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7575961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Prosthetics: impressions and models].
    Roucoules L
    Chir Dent Fr; 1977 May; 47(350):57-61. PubMed ID: 369786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fabricating non-precious metal bases.
    Dootz ER
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jan; 24(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 6987099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.