These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6217124)

  • 1. [First clinical experiences with a new large frame intensifier in thoracic diagnosis].
    Neufang KF; Friedmann G; Peters PE; Fischer PG; Kronholz HL
    Rofo; 1982 Nov; 137(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 6217124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image-intensifier photofluorography and conventional chest radiography: comparison of diagnostic efficacy.
    Manninen H; Partanen K; Soimakallio S; Rytkönen H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Mar; 150(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 3257605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large-screen image intensifier photofluorography compared with full-size screen-film technique in chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Rytkönen H; Soimakallio S; Terho EO; Hentunen J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(5):525-33. PubMed ID: 4072746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [DS-1000--a new digital image intensifier film-screen system in thoracic diagnosis].
    Schuler M; Hübsch T; Rienmüller R; Frey J; Schmidt H
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1988 Mar; 8(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 3383536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Imaging properties of digital image-intensifier radiography compared to the conventional x-ray technic for chest pictures].
    Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 2536505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Basic imaging properties of a large image intensifier-TV digital chest radiographic system.
    Fujita H; Doi K; MacMahon H; Kume Y; Giger ML; Hoffmann KR; Katafuchi T; Ohara K; Chan HP
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Apr; 22(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 3583653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of heart size and pulmonary vasculature. Conventional chest roentgenography and image intensifier photofluorography compared.
    Manninen H; Remes J; Partanen K; Tynkkynen P; Mykkänen L; Laakso M; Soimakallio S; Pyörälä K
    Acta Radiol; 1991 May; 32(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 1829619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Image intensifying split radiography].
    Reuter M; Buurman R
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Dec; 41(12):477-83. PubMed ID: 3212362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
    Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W
    Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image intensifier based digital chest radiography. Visibility of lesions and anatomy.
    Kheddache S; Denbratt L; Angelhed JE; Schlossman D
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Nov; 34(6):618-21. PubMed ID: 8240899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation into the radiation dose associated with different imaging systems for chest radiology.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):353-9. PubMed ID: 8173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of an anatomical compensation filter for chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Rytkönen H; Soimakallio S; Terho EO; Hentunen J
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Nov; 59(707):1087-92. PubMed ID: 3790895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.