These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6219145)

  • 1. Visual and tactual perception of syllable number in sentence stimuli.
    Bourgeois MS; Goldstein H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):367-71. PubMed ID: 6219145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of connected discourse.
    Sparks DW; Ardell LA; Bourgeois M; Wiedmer B; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Mar; 65(3):810-5. PubMed ID: 447911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisensory narrative tracking by a profoundly deaf subject using an electrocutaneous vocoder and a vibrotactile aid.
    Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Urbano RC; Pero PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 2739385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two training strategies for speech recognition with an electrotactile speech processor.
    Alcantara JI; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 2138238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception studies using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, residual hearing, and lipreading.
    Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2593-607. PubMed ID: 2526169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of segmental features of speech.
    Sparks DW; Kuhl PK; Edmonds AE; Gray GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jan; 63(1):246-57. PubMed ID: 632417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception with a single-channel cochlear implant: a comparison with a single-channel tactile device.
    Carney AE; Kienle M; Miyamoto RT
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 2141660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2521904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception by congenitally deaf subjects using an electrocutaneous vocoder.
    Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Lavoie L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1988; 25(3):41-50. PubMed ID: 2970542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The transmission of prosodic information via an electrotactile speechreading aid.
    Grant KW; Ardell LA; Kuhl PK; Sparks DW
    Ear Hear; 1986 Oct; 7(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 2945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial, tactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency as a supplement to lipreading: results of extended training with a single subject.
    Boothroyd A; Hnath-Chisolm T
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1988; 25(3):51-6. PubMed ID: 2970543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative performance of single-channel and multichannel tactile aids for speech perception.
    Weisenberger JM; Broadstone SM; Kozma-Spytek L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1991; 28(2):45-56. PubMed ID: 1829759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactual speech perception by minimally trained deaf subjects.
    Oller DK; Payne SL; Gavin WJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):769-78. PubMed ID: 6449633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tactile perception.
    Rosen S; Fourcin AJ; Douek EE; Walliker JR; Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 1983 Aug; 17(3):213-4. PubMed ID: 6227355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tactual display of consonant voicing as a supplement to lipreading.
    Yuan H; Reed CM; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1003-15. PubMed ID: 16158656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of handedness in tactile speech perception.
    Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(4):423-35. PubMed ID: 8158558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lipreading with tactile supplements.
    Boothroyd A; Hnath T
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 3958995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory projects in tactile aids to lipreading.
    De Filippo CL
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(4):211-27. PubMed ID: 6468779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.