136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6220102)
1. Comparative diagnostic performance of the Telemed computer ECG program.
Bernard P; Chaitman BR; Scholl JM; Val PG; Chabot M
J Electrocardiol; 1983 Jan; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 6220102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Value of the automated analysis of the electrocardiogram by the Telemed program (V version)].
Bernard P; Chaitman BR; Scholl JM; Chabot M
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Oct; 74(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 6796019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of 3 ECG computer programs with interpretation by physicians].
Saner H; Lindeland A; Scallen R; Paule W; Lange HW; Gobel FL
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jul; 117(27-28):1035-9. PubMed ID: 3303319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How the computer helps the cardiologist interpret ECG's.
Bertrand CA; Godbold EO; Duffy JC; Hillman G; Trout KW
IMS Ind Med Surg; 1973; 42(7):14-5 passim. PubMed ID: 4582093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. XYZ data interpreted by a 12-lead computer program using the derived electrocardiogram.
Dower GE; Machado HB
J Electrocardiol; 1979 Jul; 12(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 89179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a computer programme for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms.
Landelius J; Nordgren L
Ups J Med Sci; 1979; 84(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 155918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and performance of Mayo-IBM electrocardiographic computer analysis programs (V70).
Hu KC; Francis DB; Gau GT; Smith RE
Mayo Clin Proc; 1973 Apr; 48(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 4266427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. II. Application to version D of the PHS program and the Mayo Clinic program of 1968.
Bailey JJ; Itscoitz SB; Grauer LE; Hirshfeld JW; Horton MR
Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 4276019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Vectorcardiographic, electrocardiographic, and angiographic correlations in apparently isolated inferior wall myocardial infarction.
Mehta J; Hoffman I; Smedresman P; Hilsenrath J; Hamby R
Am Heart J; 1976 Jun; 91(6):699-704. PubMed ID: 132112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrocardiogram computer analysis. practical value of the IBM Bonner-2 (V2 MO) program.
Garcia R; Breneman GM; Goldstein S
J Electrocardiol; 1981 Jul; 14(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 6455484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Automatic computerized ECG interpretation].
Nordgaard-Andersen I
Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Apr; 153(15):1049-51. PubMed ID: 2024327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of an ECG computer analysis program on the cardiologist's interpretation. A cooperative study.
Milliken JA; Pipberger H; Pipberger HV; Araoye MA; Ari R; Burggraf GW; Fletcher RD; Katz RJ; Lopez EA; McCans JL; Silver AM
J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr; 16(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6222129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of the IBM (12-lead) and Royal Infirmary (orthogonal three-lead) ECG computer programs.
Macfarlane PW; Melville DI; Horton MR; Bailey JJ
Circulation; 1981 Feb; 63(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 6450002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of ST segment elevation criteria for the prehospital electrocardiographic diagnosis fo acute myocardial infarction.
Otto LA; Aufderheide TP
Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8273952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of automated processing of electrocardiograms by the Veterans Administration program (AVA 3.4).
Brohet CR; Richman HG
Am J Cardiol; 1979 Jun; 43(6):1167-74. PubMed ID: 155985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. I. Application to the experimental IBM program of 1971.
Bailey JJ; Itscoitz SB; Hirshfeld JW; Grauer LE; Horton MR
Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 4276018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram.
Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D
Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of editing on the performance of a computer program for serial comparison of electrocardiograms.
Bonner RE; Crevasse L; Ferrer MI; Greenfield JC
J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr; 16(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 6687897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
Morisbak B; Gjesdal K
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A comparison of various computer programmes for analysing the electrocardiogram].
Meyer J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1972 Apr; 97(14):552-9. PubMed ID: 4112250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
