These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6220116)

  • 1. Response tempo and separable--integral responding: evidence for an integral-to-separable processing sequence in visual perception.
    Ward TB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Feb; 9(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 6220116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separable and integral responding by children and adults to the dimensions of length and density.
    Ward TB
    Child Dev; 1980 Sep; 51(3):676-84. PubMed ID: 7418505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accessing similarity and dimensional relations: effects of integrality and separability on the discovery of complex concepts.
    Kemler DG; Smith LB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Jun; 108(2):133-50. PubMed ID: 528902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Atypical perception in autism: A failure of perceptual specialization?
    Hadad BS; Goldstein EK; Russo NN
    Autism Res; 2017 Sep; 10(9):1510-1522. PubMed ID: 28474512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The priority of separable perception in stimulus classifications of children with mental retardation.
    Cook G; Stephens JT
    Child Dev; 1995 Aug; 66(4):1057-71. PubMed ID: 7671650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental differences in visual processing: strategy versus structure.
    Ruskin EM; Kaye DB
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Aug; 50(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 2398327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial metrics of integral and separable dimensions.
    Dunn JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Apr; 9(2):242-57. PubMed ID: 6221069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classifying color materials: children are less holistic than adults.
    Ward TB; Vela E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1986 Oct; 42(2):273-302. PubMed ID: 3760776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feeling the parts: a developmental study of separable perception with tactile dimensions.
    Cook G; Sprague R
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Apr; 122(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 7790847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Logical rules and the classification of integral-dimension stimuli.
    Little DR; Nosofsky RM; Donkin C; Denton SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):801-20. PubMed ID: 22905932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The classification of graphical elements.
    Hollands JG
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Mar; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 12674368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classifying intergral stimuli.
    Lockhead GR; King MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1977 Aug; 3(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 886277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classifying multidimensional stimuli: stimulus, task, and observer factors.
    Ward TB; Foley CM; Cole J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 May; 12(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 2940325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Circle size and diameter tilt: a new look at integrality and separability.
    Potts BC; Melara RD; Marks LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Jan; 60(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 9503915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Holistic and analytic modes of processing: the multiple determinants of perceptual analysis.
    Foard CF; Nelson DG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1984 Mar; 113(1):94-111. PubMed ID: 6242409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modification of cognitive tempo on a haptic-visual matching task.
    Rupert PA; Baird R
    J Genet Psychol; 1979 Dec; 135(2d Half):165-74. PubMed ID: 528986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why are some dimensions integral? Testing two hypotheses through causal learning experiments.
    Soto FA; Quintana GR; Pérez-Acosta AM; Ponce FP; Vogel EH
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():163-77. PubMed ID: 26163820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The structure of integral dimensions: contrasting topological and Cartesian representations.
    Jones M; Goldstone RL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):111-132. PubMed ID: 22799263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual sensitivity to dimensional and similarity relations in free and rule-governed classifications.
    Cook GL; Odom RD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1988 Apr; 45(2):319-38. PubMed ID: 3361271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: the Stroop effect revisited.
    Algom D; Dekel A; Pansky A
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Sep; 24(5):557-72. PubMed ID: 8870527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.